AMarketsvs
Windsor BrokersCrypto Exchange Comparison
This comparison pits an offshore-registered crypto CFD broker against a CySEC-regulated firm with a long track record. The tension centers on regulation, protection, and pricing transparency.
Our Verdict
Windsor Brokers winsby 0.2 pts
Windsor Brokers edges AMarkets on editorial score, supported by CySEC regulation and compensation fund coverage; AMarkets operates offshore SVG/FSA with weaker investor protection.
No commercial relationship. The verdict and scores are entirely editorial. No payment influences this comparison.
Key Differences
- 1AMarkets offers 24/5 live chat support.
- 2AMarkets lists 8 crypto coins vs Windsor's 6.
- 3Windsor has CySEC regulation with compensation fund.
Who should choose AMarkets vs Windsor Brokers?
Find out which crypto exchange best suits your trading profile.
Choose AMarkets if…
AMarkets: Choose AMarkets if you value 24/5 live chat support. You also get a broader coin list with 8 assets. Windsor: Choose Windsor Brokers if you prefer CySEC regulation with a compensation fund. It offers zero-commission Prime accounts and a 30+ year track record.
Choose Windsor Brokers if…
AMarkets: Choose AMarkets if you value 24/5 live chat support. You also get a broader coin list with 8 assets. Windsor: Choose Windsor Brokers if you prefer CySEC regulation with a compensation fund. It offers zero-commission Prime accounts and a 30+ year track record.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which exchange wins for each type of crypto trader, based on security, fees, coin selection, and editorial scoring.
Best for security
Recommended
Windsor Brokers wins for security due to CySEC regulation and compensation fund coverage.
Best for low fees
AMarkets vs Windsor Brokers: Side-by-Side Crypto Exchange Comparison
| Criteria |  AMarkets |  Windsor Brokers |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 3.3/ 5 | 3.5/ 5 |
| Min Deposit | $100 | $100 |
| Spreads From | 0 pips | 0 pips |
| Taker Fee | 6.00%▼ lower | 8.00% |
AMarkets vs Windsor Brokers Crypto Exchange Pros & Cons
Pros
- Crypto CFDs available with high leverage options
- MT4/MT5 with copy trading integration
- Low spreads on standard and ECN account types
Cons
- Offshore regulation (SVG/FSA), minimal investor protection
- 3000:1 leverage on forex is extremely high-risk
AMarkets vs Windsor Brokers: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each exchange meets or misses within each scoring category.
1
AMarkets
criteria win
2
Windsor Brokers
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two exchanges differ
| Criteria | AMarkets | Windsor Brokers |
|---|---|---|
| Security | ||
| Cold storage for assets | Fail | Fail |
| Proof of reserves published | Fail | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, etc.) | Fail | Pass |
| Fees | ||
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Fail | Fail |
| Transparent pricing page | Fail | Pass |
| Features | ||
| Staking available | Fail | Fail |
| DeFi integration | Fail | Fail |
| NFT trading | Fail | Fail |
| 500+ coins listed | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Fail |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
AMarkets vs Windsor Brokers: Frequently Asked Questions
The scores are close: AMarkets rates 3.3/5 and Windsor Brokers rates 3.5/5. Windsor Brokers has a marginal edge in our scoring, but the difference is small enough that your specific priorities — fees, platforms, or regulatory jurisdiction — should guide the final choice.
Both AMarkets and Windsor Brokers list the same spread figure of 0. Compare each exchange's full fee schedule, including maker/taker rates and any volume discounts, to evaluate total trading costs.
Both AMarkets and Windsor Brokers require a minimum deposit of $100 to start trading crypto.
Windsor Brokers holds top-tier regulation (CySEC, FSCA), providing stronger investor protections. AMarkets may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
For beginners, Windsor Brokers provides negative balance protection, capping losses at your deposit amount. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources on each exchange's site before deciding.
AMarkets offers up to 2:1 on perpetual or margin products, versus Windsor Brokers's 2:1 cap. Margin and futures trading carry higher risk than spot crypto; confirm product availability and jurisdiction-specific limits on each exchange's website.
AMarkets charges $6 per trade, lower than Windsor Brokers's $8 per trade. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day. Crypto fees are typically quoted as maker/taker rates rather than fixed per-trade commissions; check each exchange's fee schedule for volume-based discounts.
AMarkets supports cTrader, MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4, while Windsor Brokers supports MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4. Both provide MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4. AMarkets has exclusive access to cTrader.
