AMarkets vs Windsor Brokers Crypto Exchange Comparison
A head-to-head comparison of AMarkets and Windsor Brokers across security, fees, coin selection, staking, and editorial scoring.
Score 3.3 / 5
AMarkets is an offshore multi-asset broker offering crypto CFDs with extremely high leverage - suited to aggressive traders comfortable with offshore regulatory risk.
VS
Score 3.5 / 5
Windsor Brokers offers crypto CFDs under CySEC regulation - a Cypriot ECN broker with a 30-year track record offering institutional-style execution for retail crypto traders.
Our Verdict
Windsor Brokers winsby 0.2 pts
Windsor Brokers edges ahead with a score of 3.5/5 vs AMarkets's 3.3/5. A narrow margin, so review the breakdown below to see where each broker has a clear advantage.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which exchange wins for each type of crypto trader, based on security, fees, coin selection, and editorial scoring.
Best for security
Recommended
Windsor Brokers scores higher on security: top-tier regulation, segregated funds.
Best for low fees
It's a tie
Both equally suited
Both exchanges offer equivalent fee conditions — no deposit fee and no inactivity fee.
Best for beginners
Recommended
Windsor Brokers edges out AMarkets with a higher editorial score (3.5/5 vs 3.3/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new crypto traders.
Best for coin selection
Insufficient data
Data not yet available
Coin-selection data is not yet available for this pair. Check each exchange's supported assets page to compare the number of tradeable cryptocurrencies.
Best for DeFi & Web3
Insufficient data
Data not yet available
DeFi and NFT feature data is not yet available for this pair. Check each exchange's Web3 product pages directly.
AMarkets vs Windsor Brokers: Side-by-Side Crypto Exchange Comparison
| Criteria |  AMarkets |  Windsor Brokers |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial Score | 3.3/ 5 | 3.5/ 5 |
| Min. Deposit | $100 | $100 |
| Regulators | SVGFSA | CySEC FSCA |
| Cold Storage | No | No |
| Proof of Reserves | No | No |
| Staking | No | No |
| DeFi Integration | No | No |
| NFT Trading | No | No |
| 500+ Coins | No | No |
| P2P Trading | No | No |
| Crypto Earn / Savings | No | No |
| Token Launchpad | No | No |
| Visit exchange | Visit AMarkets | Visit Windsor Brokers |
AMarkets vs Windsor Brokers Crypto Exchange Pros & Cons
Pros
- Crypto CFDs available with high leverage options
- MT4/MT5 with copy trading integration
- Low spreads on standard and ECN account types
Cons
- Offshore regulation (SVG/FSA) - minimal investor protection
- 3000:1 leverage on forex is extremely high-risk
- Limited regulated transparency versus tier-1 brokers
Pros
- CySEC regulated with ICF compensation fund coverage up to EUR 20,000
- 30+ years of operation - strong track record for an offshore-focused peer
- MT4/MT5 with zero commission on Prime accounts
Cons
- EU-focused regulation limits access for non-EU clients to weaker offshore entity
- Crypto selection is limited to major pairs
- Less brand recognition vs larger CySEC-regulated competitors
AMarkets vs Windsor Brokers: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each exchange meets or misses within each scoring category.
1
AMarkets
criteria win
2
Windsor Brokers
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two exchanges differ
| Criteria | AMarkets | Windsor Brokers |
|---|---|---|
| Security | ||
| Cold storage for assets | Fail | Fail |
| Proof of reserves published | Fail | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, etc.) | Fail | Pass |
| Fees | ||
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Fail | Fail |
| Transparent pricing page | Fail | Pass |
| Features | ||
| Staking available | Fail | Fail |
| DeFi integration | Fail | Fail |
| NFT trading | Fail | Fail |
| 500+ coins listed | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Fail |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
AMarkets vs Windsor Brokers: Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our independent editorial scoring, Windsor Brokers ranks higher with a score of 3.5/5 vs 3.3/5 for AMarkets. The best choice still depends on your individual needs — security, coin selection, fees, and staking offerings all matter.
Windsor Brokers scores higher on our security criteria. When evaluating exchange safety, look for cold storage, proof of reserves, regulatory oversight, and segregated client funds. Always verify the current security posture directly with the exchange.
AMarkets and Windsor Brokers appear similar on fee criteria in our data. Compare each exchange's trading fee schedule directly, as crypto fees vary by asset, volume tier, and payment method.
Neither AMarkets nor Windsor Brokers is listed as offering staking in our data. Check each exchange's website directly for the most up-to-date staking offerings, as this feature changes frequently.
Both AMarkets and Windsor Brokers require a minimum deposit of $100 to start trading.
For beginners: Windsor Brokers has a higher overall editorial score. Also consider each exchange's educational resources, customer support quality, and the simplicity of their user interface before deciding.
More Crypto Exchange Comparisons
More AMarkets comparisons
Personalised recommendation
Not sure which broker is right for you?
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker