AMarketsvs
IC MarketsCrypto Exchange Comparison
Two CFD brokers offer crypto exposure with different regulatory footprints and asset breadth. This matchup tests how regulation, pricing, and platform reach shape risk and opportunity.
Our Verdict
IC Markets winsClear Winner
IC Markets outperforms AMarkets on the editorial score (4.1 vs 3.3) and has regulation by ASIC, CySEC and FSCA. AMarkets remains offshore under SVG/FSA regulation.
IC Markets
4.1/5
AMarkets
3.3/5
Key Differences
- 1IC Markets is regulated by ASIC, CySEC and FSCA.
- 2IC Markets has no inactivity fee.
- 3AMarkets operates under SVG/FSA offshore regulation.
Who should choose AMarkets vs IC Markets?
Find out which crypto exchange best suits your trading profile.
Choose AMarkets if…
Choose AMarkets if you accept offshore SVG/FSA regulation and higher regulatory risk. Be aware there is an inactivity fee and limited investor protection.
Choose IC Markets if…
Choose IC Markets if you want multi-regulator oversight (ASIC, CySEC, FSCA) and no inactivity fee. You gain 20+ crypto CFDs and access to MT4, MT5, cTrader, and TradingView from one account.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which exchange wins for each type of crypto trader, based on security, fees, coin selection, and editorial scoring.
Best for security
Recommended
IC Markets wins for security due to multi-regulator oversight and segregated funds with negative balance protection.
Best for low fees
AMarkets vs IC Markets: Side-by-Side Crypto Exchange Comparison
| Criteria |  AMarkets |  IC Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 3.3/ 5 | 4.1/ 5 |
| Min Deposit | $100▼ lower | $200 |
| Spreads From | 0 pips | 0 pips |
| Taker Fee | 6.00%▼ lower | 7.00% |
AMarkets vs IC Markets Crypto Exchange Pros & Cons
Pros
- Crypto CFDs available with high leverage options
- MT4/MT5 with copy trading integration
- Low spreads on standard and ECN account types
Cons
- Offshore regulation (SVG/FSA), minimal investor protection
- 3000:1 leverage on forex is extremely high-risk
AMarkets vs IC Markets: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each exchange meets or misses within each scoring category.
0
AMarkets
criteria wins
3
IC Markets
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two exchanges differ
| Criteria | AMarkets | IC Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Security | ||
| Cold storage for assets | Fail | Fail |
| Proof of reserves published | Fail | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, etc.) | Fail | Pass |
| Fees | ||
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Fail | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Fail | Pass |
| Features | ||
| Staking available | Fail | Fail |
| DeFi integration | Fail | Fail |
| NFT trading | Fail | Fail |
| 500+ coins listed | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
AMarkets vs IC Markets: Frequently Asked Questions
IC Markets rates 4.1/5 versus 3.3/5 for AMarkets. IC Markets edges ahead on our composite score, though both exchanges meet a reasonable standard for most traders.
Both AMarkets and IC Markets list the same spread figure of 0. Compare each exchange's full fee schedule, including maker/taker rates and any volume discounts, to evaluate total trading costs.
AMarkets has $100, while IC Markets requires at least $200. This makes AMarkets more accessible for traders looking to start with a smaller crypto investment.
IC Markets holds top-tier regulation (FSCA, ASIC, CySEC), providing stronger investor protections. AMarkets may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
For beginners, two factors stand out: AMarkets requires a lower minimum deposit ($100), lowering the barrier to entry, and IC Markets provides negative balance protection, capping losses at your deposit amount. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
AMarkets offers up to 2:1 on perpetual or margin products, versus IC Markets's 2:1 cap. Margin and futures trading carry higher risk than spot crypto; confirm product availability and jurisdiction-specific limits on each exchange's website.
AMarkets charges $6 per trade, lower than IC Markets's $7 per trade. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day. Crypto fees are typically quoted as maker/taker rates rather than fixed per-trade commissions; check each exchange's fee schedule for volume-based discounts.
AMarkets supports cTrader, MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4, while IC Markets supports cTrader, MetaTrader 5, TradingView, MetaTrader 4. Both provide cTrader and MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4. IC Markets has exclusive access to TradingView.
IC Markets scores better on fee criteria (no deposit fee, no inactivity fee). Always check both exchanges' current fee schedules, as maker/taker rates and withdrawal fees vary and are subject to change.
