AMarketsvs
FP MarketsCrypto Exchange Comparison
Two CFD brokers present crypto exposure but diverge on regulation and platform breadth. AMarkets offers offshore risk and high leverage options, while FP Markets emphasizes regulated access across multiple platforms.
Our Verdict
FP Markets winsClear Winner
FP Markets edges AMarkets on the editorial score (4.0 vs 3.3). Its stronger regulatory framework and platform tools drive the gap.
FP Markets
4.0/5
AMarkets
3.3/5
Key Differences
- 1Coin count: FP Markets lists 15 vs AMarkets 8.
- 2Inactivity fees apply at FP Markets but not AMarkets.
- 3FP Markets uses transparent pricing; AMarkets does not.
Who should choose AMarkets vs FP Markets?
Find out which crypto exchange best suits your trading profile.
Choose AMarkets if…
Choose AMarkets if you prefer offshore regulation and eight crypto coins.
Choose FP Markets if…
Choose FP Markets if you value ASIC/CySEC regulation, a compensation scheme, and fifteen coins.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which exchange wins for each type of crypto trader, based on security, fees, coin selection, and editorial scoring.
Best for security
Recommended
FP Markets wins for security with ASIC/CySEC regulation and segregated client funds.
Best for low fees
It’s a tie
Both equally suited
FP Markets offers no crypto CFD commissions and spread-only pricing.
AMarkets vs FP Markets: Side-by-Side Crypto Exchange Comparison
| Criteria |  AMarkets |  FP Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 3.3/ 5 | 4.0/ 5 |
| Min Deposit | $100 | $100 |
| Spreads From | 0 pips | 0 pips |
| Taker Fee | 6.00% | 6.00% |
AMarkets vs FP Markets Crypto Exchange Pros & Cons
Pros
- Crypto CFDs available with high leverage options
- MT4/MT5 with copy trading integration
- Low spreads on standard and ECN account types
Cons
- Offshore regulation (SVG/FSA), minimal investor protection
- 3000:1 leverage on forex is extremely high-risk
AMarkets vs FP Markets: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each exchange meets or misses within each scoring category.
0
AMarkets
criteria wins
3
FP Markets
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two exchanges differ
| Criteria | AMarkets | FP Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Security | ||
| Cold storage for assets | Fail | Fail |
| Proof of reserves published | Fail | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, etc.) | Fail | Pass |
| Fees | ||
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Fail | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Fail | Pass |
| Features | ||
| Staking available | Fail | Fail |
| DeFi integration | Fail | Fail |
| NFT trading | Fail | Fail |
| 500+ coins listed | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
AMarkets vs FP Markets: Frequently Asked Questions
FP Markets rates 4/5 versus 3.3/5 for AMarkets. FP Markets edges ahead on our composite score, though both exchanges meet a reasonable standard for most traders.
Both AMarkets and FP Markets list the same spread figure of 0. Compare each exchange's full fee schedule, including maker/taker rates and any volume discounts, to evaluate total trading costs.
Both AMarkets and FP Markets require a minimum deposit of $100 to start trading crypto.
FP Markets holds top-tier regulation (ASIC, CySEC), providing stronger investor protections. AMarkets may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
For beginners, FP Markets provides negative balance protection, capping losses at your deposit amount. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources on each exchange's site before deciding.
AMarkets offers up to 2:1 on perpetual or margin products, versus FP Markets's 2:1 cap. Margin and futures trading carry higher risk than spot crypto; confirm product availability and jurisdiction-specific limits on each exchange's website.
Both AMarkets and FP Markets charge the same commission of $6 per trade on applicable accounts. Crypto fees are typically quoted as maker/taker rates rather than fixed per-trade commissions; check each exchange's fee schedule for volume-based discounts.
AMarkets supports cTrader, MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4, while FP Markets supports cTrader, IRESS, MetaTrader 5, TradingView, MetaTrader 4. Both provide cTrader and MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4. FP Markets has exclusive access to IRESS and TradingView.
FP Markets scores better on fee criteria (no deposit fee, no inactivity fee). Always check both exchanges' current fee schedules, as maker/taker rates and withdrawal fees vary and are subject to change.
