Admirals vs Interactive Brokers Stock Broker Comparison
A head-to-head comparison of Admirals and Interactive Brokers across regulation, commissions, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Admirals offers share CFDs and real stocks on 4,500+ equities via MT4, MT5, and Invest.MT5 under FCA, CySEC, and ASIC regulation - combining professional MetaTrader CFD trading with real share ownership for buy-and-hold investors.
Interactive Brokers offers unrivalled market access and the lowest commissions in the industry for active stock traders. The TWS platform is extremely powerful but has a steep learning curve for beginners.
Interactive Brokers comes out ahead with an editorial score of 4.8/5 compared to Admirals's 4/5.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of stock trader, based on costs, safety, features, and editorial scoring.
Both Admirals and Interactive Brokers offer commission-free stock trading, making them equally cost-effective on this metric.
Admirals has a stronger safety profile: top-tier regulation, compensation scheme, segregated funds, negative balance protection.
Interactive Brokers is better suited for long-term investing: fractional shares, dividend reinvestment, IPO access.
Both brokers offer equivalent conditions for active trading across commissions, platforms, and charting tools.
Interactive Brokers edges out Admirals with a higher editorial score (4.8/5 vs 4/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new stock investors.
Admirals vs Interactive Brokers: Side-by-Side Stock Broker Comparison
| Editorial score | 4.0/ 5 | 4.8/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Min deposit | No minimum | No minimum |
| Commission-free | Yes | Yes |
| Fractional shares | No | Yes |
| Dividend reinvestment | No | Yes |
| Extended hours | No | Yes |
| IPO access | No | Yes |
| Short selling | Yes | Yes |
| Regulators | FCA ASIC CySEC KNF | SEC FCA CMF ASIC JFSA SEBI AMF SFC FINRA DFSA CMVM NFA IIROC CNV FSC CBI CNB MFSA |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 | Proprietary Web/Mobile Trader Workstation (TWS) |
| Active bonuses | None | 2 offers |
| Visit broker | Visit Admirals | Visit Interactive Brokers |
Admirals vs Interactive Brokers Stock Broker Pros & Cons
- Real share ownership via Invest.MT5 at zero commission alongside leveraged share CFDs
- 4,500+ stocks and ETFs across MT4 and MT5 with MetaTrader Supreme Edition
- FCA, CySEC, and ASIC regulated - strong multi-jurisdictional profile
- No minimum deposit on standard accounts; FSCS protection for UK clients
- Invest.MT5 (real shares) and CFD account are separate products - no unified view
- No ISA or SIPP tax wrapper available
- MetaTrader only - no proprietary trading platform beyond the Supreme Edition plugin
- Inactivity fee applies on Invest.MT5 accounts after dormancy
- Access to 150+ global markets across 33+ countries
- Industry-leading low commissions for active traders
- IBKR Lite tier offers commission-free US stock trading
- Powerful TWS platform with DMA, options, and API access
- Regulated by SEC, FINRA, FCA, ASIC and other Tier 1 bodies
- IPO access available through IBKR IPO platform
- TWS platform has a very steep learning curve
- IBKR Pro's tiered commission structure is complex
- Customer service can be slow for account-level queries
- Minimum activity fees may apply on smaller accounts
Admirals vs Interactive Brokers: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
| Criteria | Admirals | Interactive Brokers |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, SEC, etc.) | Pass | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Fail |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS, SIPC) | Pass | Fail |
| Costs | ||
| Commission-free trading | Pass | Pass |
| Features | ||
| Fractional shares | Fail | Pass |
| Dividend reinvestment (DRIP) | Fail | Pass |
| Extended hours trading | Fail | Pass |
| IPO access | Fail | Pass |
| Short selling | Pass | Pass |
| Stock screener tool | Fail | Pass |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
Admirals vs Interactive Brokers: Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our independent editorial scoring, Interactive Brokers ranks higher with a score of 4.8/5 vs 4/5 for Admirals. The best choice still depends on your needs — commissions, features like fractional shares, and regulatory coverage all matter.
Yes, both Admirals and Interactive Brokers offer commission-free stock trading according to our data. Keep in mind that "commission-free" brokers may still charge spread costs, foreign exchange fees, or platform fees — always check the full fee schedule on each broker's website.
Admirals scores higher on our regulatory safety criteria, with top-tier regulatory oversight, segregated client funds, compensation scheme coverage. For stock investors, regulatory safety is critical — always confirm a broker's specific licences and investor protections before depositing funds.
Both Admirals and Interactive Brokers require a minimum deposit of no minimum to open a live trading account.
Admirals supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5 and Interactive Brokers offers Proprietary Web/Mobile, Trader Workstation (TWS). Platform availability affects the tools, charting, and order types available to you. If you rely on a specific platform like MetaTrader or a proprietary web app, confirm compatibility before opening an account.
For beginners: Admirals offers negative balance protection; Interactive Brokers has a higher overall editorial score. Also compare educational resources, customer support quality, and the simplicity of each broker's platform before deciding.
More Stock Broker Comparisons
More Admirals comparisons
More Interactive Brokers comparisons
Personalised recommendation
Not sure which broker is right for you?
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker