This matchup pits FP Markets against MIFX on regulation, pricing, and platform reach. The resulting choice hinges on global vs local capabilities.
FP Markets leads overall on editorial score (4.5 vs 3.8), reflecting stronger regulation and platform breadth.
Find out which broker best suits your trader profile.
Choose FP Markets if…
Choose FP Markets if you prioritize top-tier regulation and investor protection. It also offers a broad instrument universe and advanced charting.
Choose MIFX if…
Choose MIFX if you want domestic Indonesian regulation and IDR-denominated accounts. It also offers a proprietary trading platform.
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
FP Markets offers tighter spreads from 0.00 pips vs 1.50 pips for MIFX, reducing trading costs.
| Editorial score | 4.5/ 5 | 3.8/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 4.6 / 5▲ | 3.7 / 5 |
Pros
True ECN pricing from 0.0 pips + $6 round-turn commission
Supports MT4, MT5, and cTrader, all three major platforms
IRESS platform for direct-access share CFD trading
Strong ASIC and CySEC regulation
Client funds held in segregated accounts
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
| Criteria | FP Markets | MIFX |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Pass | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Fail |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Pass | Fail |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Pass | Pass |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Pass | Pass |
| Proprietary platform | Fail | Pass |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Fail |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
| Multilingual support | Pass | Fail |
FP Markets rates 4.5/5 versus 3.8/5 for MIFX. FP Markets edges ahead on our composite score, though both brokers meet a reasonable standard for most traders.
FP Markets starts from 0 pips, tighter than MIFX's 1.5 pips. Tighter spreads lower the cost per trade, which matters most for high-frequency and scalping strategies.
MIFX has $30, while FP Markets requires at least $100. This makes MIFX more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
FP Markets holds top-tier regulation (ASIC, CySEC), providing stronger investor protections. MIFX may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
For beginners, two factors stand out: MIFX requires a lower minimum deposit ($30), lowering the barrier to entry, and FP Markets provides negative balance protection, capping losses at your deposit amount. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
FP Markets lists maximum leverage of 500:1, while MIFX lists up to 100:1. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
FP Markets charges $6 per lot on commission-based accounts. Commission details for MIFX are not currently available. Check their website for up-to-date pricing.
FP Markets supports cTrader, IRESS, MetaTrader 5, TradingView, MetaTrader 4, while MIFX supports Proprietary Web/Mobile, MetaTrader 4. Both provide MetaTrader 4. FP Markets has exclusive access to cTrader and IRESS and MetaTrader 5 and TradingView. MIFX has exclusive access to Proprietary Web/Mobile.
FP Markets wins safety & regulation with ASIC/CySEC oversight and client fund segregation.
FP Markets wins for active traders with true ECN pricing and broad instrument access.
FP Markets is better suited for scalpers: tighter spreads from 0.00 pips.
FP Markets wins platform choice with MT4/MT5, cTrader, TradingView, and IRESS.
FP Markets wins for beginners thanks to multilingual support.
FP Markets dominates instrument variety with about 10,000 tradable assets.
Fees & Spreads 30% weight | 4.5 / 5▲ | 3.9 / 5 |
|---|
Platforms & Tools 20% weight | 4.4 / 5▲ | 3.8 / 5 |
|---|
Customer Support 10% weight | 4.3 / 5▲ | 3.9 / 5 |
|---|
| Founded | 2005 | 2003 |
|---|
| Headquarters | Sydney, Australia | Jakarta, Indonesia |
|---|
| Min Deposit | $100 | $30▼ lower |
|---|
| Spreads From | 0 pips▼ lower | 1.5 pips |
|---|
| Commission / lot | $6/lot | N/A |
|---|
| 0.6 pips | N/A |
| Max Leverage | 500:1▲ higher | 100:1 |
|---|
| Inactivity Fee | None | None |
|---|
| Deposit Fee | Free | Free |
|---|
| Deposit methods | Bank transferCredit cardDebit cardSkrillNetellerPOLiPayPal | Bank transferCredit cardDebit card |
|---|
| Withdrawal methods | Bank transferCredit cardSkrillNetellerPOLi | Bank transfer |
|---|
| Withdrawal Fee | Free | Free |
|---|
| Regulators | ASIC CySEC | BAPPEBTI OJK |
|---|
| Platforms | cTrader IRESS MetaTrader 5 TradingView MetaTrader 4 | Proprietary Web/Mobile MetaTrader 4 |
|---|
| Active bonuses |
|---|
Negative balance protection
Investor compensation scheme coverage
Raw spread account available
No deposit fees
No inactivity fee
MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported
Mobile trading app available
Advanced charting tools included
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Phone support available
Multilingual customer support
Pros
Over 20 years of operation as an Indonesian-licensed broker
Holds both BAPPEBTI and OJK licences, full domestic regulatory compliance
Supports local Indonesian bank transfers for deposits and withdrawals
IDR account denomination avoids currency conversion costs
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Raw spread account available
No deposit fees
No inactivity fee
MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported
Mobile trading app available
Proprietary trading platform available
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Phone support available
Cons
IRESS platform has a monthly fee for lower-volume traders
Customer support primarily oriented toward Australian trading hours
Not available to US residents
No proprietary platform
Cons
Only available to Indonesian residents, no international clients
Limited asset classes compared to international brokers
Leverage capped at 100:1 under BAPPEBTI rules
No top-tier regulatory licence
No negative balance protection
No investor compensation scheme
Limited charting capabilities
Support available in limited languages
Dig deeper into each broker’s features, fees, and regulation.
Score 3.8 / 5
Personalised recommendation
Answer 6 quick questions and we’ll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker