AMarketsvs
DukascopyForex Broker Comparison
Two brokers sit on opposite ends of regulation and platform options. The tension centers on trust, protection, and the breadth of trading tools.
Who should choose AMarkets vs Dukascopy?
Find out which broker best suits your trader profile.
Choose if…
Choose AMarkets if you want MT4/MT5 and cTrader with transparent ECN commissions.
Choose if…
Choose Dukascopy if you value top regulation and investor protection.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Best for low cost trading
Recommended
AMarkets vs Dukascopy: Side-by-Side Forex Broker Comparison
Score
= highlighted score shows which broker leads in that category| Editorial score | 3.8/ 5 | 4.3/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 3.4 / 5 | 4.9 / 5▲ |
AMarkets vs Dukascopy Forex Broker Pros & Cons
Pros
MT4, MT5, and cTrader all available
Competitive $6 round-turn ECN commission
Mature PAMM platform with full performance transparency
No inactivity fee
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Raw spread account available
AMarkets vs Dukascopy: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
1
AMarkets
criteria win
4
Dukascopy
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
| Criteria | AMarkets | Dukascopy |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Fail | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Fail | Fail |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Fail | Pass |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Pass | Pass |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Pass | Pass |
| Proprietary platform | Fail | Pass |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Fail | Pass |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Fail |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
| Multilingual support | Pass | Pass |
AMarkets vs Dukascopy: Frequently Asked Questions
Dukascopy rates 4.3/5 versus 3.8/5 for AMarkets. Dukascopy edges ahead on our composite score, though both brokers meet a reasonable standard for most traders.
AMarkets starts from 0 pips, tighter than Dukascopy's 0.1 pips. Tighter spreads lower the cost per trade, which matters most for high-frequency and scalping strategies.
AMarkets has $100, while Dukascopy requires at least $1000. This makes AMarkets more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
Dukascopy holds top-tier regulation (FSA Seychelles, FINMA), providing stronger investor protections. AMarkets may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
For beginners, AMarkets requires a lower minimum deposit ($100), lowering the barrier to entry. Both brokers otherwise share similar beginner-facing criteria in our data. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources on each brokers's site.
AMarkets lists maximum leverage of 3000:1, while Dukascopy lists up to 200:1. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
AMarkets charges $6 per lot, lower than Dukascopy's $7 per lot. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day.
AMarkets supports cTrader, MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4, while Dukascopy supports Proprietary Web/Mobile, MetaTrader 4. Both provide MetaTrader 4. AMarkets has exclusive access to cTrader and MetaTrader 5. Dukascopy has exclusive access to Proprietary Web/Mobile.
