Crypto.comvs
FBSCrypto Exchange Comparison
Crypto.com and FBS square off as a native crypto exchange with DeFi tools against a broad-access CFD broker. The tension centers on security, asset depth, and fee clarity.
Our Verdict
Crypto.com winsClear Winner
Crypto.com leads over FBS with a higher editorial score and stronger regulatory footprint.
Crypto.com
4.1/5
FBS
3.4/5
Key Differences
- 1Crypto.com operates a native exchange with DeFi access and NFT trading.
- 2Crypto.com offers proof of reserves and a 250-coin catalog.
- 3FBS provides MT4/MT5 crypto CFDs with automated trading and a $1 minimum deposit.
Who should choose Crypto.com vs FBS?
Find out which crypto exchange best suits your trading profile.
Choose Crypto.com if…
Choose Crypto.com if you want a native exchange with DeFi access and NFT trading. You also benefit from proof of reserves and a broad catalog of coins.
Choose FBS if…
Choose FBS if you want MT4/MT5 crypto CFDs with automated trading. You also get phone support and a $1 minimum deposit.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which exchange wins for each type of crypto trader, based on security, fees, coin selection, and editorial scoring.
Best for security
Recommended
Crypto.com wins for security with proof of reserves, AAA CertiK rating, and segregated client funds.
Best for low fees
Recommended
Crypto.com vs FBS: Side-by-Side Crypto Exchange Comparison
| Criteria |  Crypto.com |  FBS |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 4.1/ 5 | 3.4/ 5 |
| Min Deposit | No minimum▼ lower | $1 |
| Spreads From | N/A | 0 pips |
| Taker Fee | 0.20%▼ lower | 20.00% |
Crypto.com vs FBS Crypto Exchange Pros & Cons
Pros
- Best crypto Visa card programme (up to 5% CRO cashback)
- MAS, VARA, AUSTRAC, and FCA (certain products) regulated
- Monthly Proof of Reserves + CertiK AAA security rating
- 35+ assets available for staking
- Most accessible ecosystem for new crypto users
- Client funds held in segregated accounts
Crypto.com vs FBS: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each exchange meets or misses within each scoring category.
8
Crypto.com
criteria wins
1
FBS
criteria win
Highlighted rows show where the two exchanges differ
| Criteria | Crypto.com | FBS |
|---|---|---|
| Security | ||
| Cold storage for assets | Pass | Fail |
| Proof of reserves published | Pass | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, etc.) | Pass | Fail |
| Fees | ||
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Fail |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Fail |
| Features | ||
| Staking available | Pass | Fail |
| DeFi integration | Pass | Fail |
| NFT trading | Pass | Fail |
| 500+ coins listed | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Fail | Pass |
Crypto.com vs FBS: Frequently Asked Questions
Crypto.com rates 4.1/5 versus 3.4/5 for FBS. Crypto.com edges ahead on our composite score, though both exchanges meet a reasonable standard for most traders.
FBS lists a spread from 0. Current spread data is not available for Crypto.com. Check both exchanges' full fee schedules, including maker/taker rates, for up-to-date pricing.
Crypto.com has no minimum deposit, while FBS requires at least $1. This makes Crypto.com more accessible for traders looking to start with a smaller crypto investment.
Crypto.com holds top-tier regulation (FCA, MAS, AUSTRAC), providing stronger investor protections. FBS may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
For beginners, Crypto.com has no minimum deposit, removing the capital barrier entirely. Both exchanges otherwise share similar beginner-facing criteria in our data. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources on each exchanges's site.
Crypto.com offers up to 10:1 on perpetual or margin products, versus FBS's 2:1 cap. Margin and futures trading carry higher risk than spot crypto; confirm product availability and jurisdiction-specific limits on each exchange's website.
Crypto.com charges $0.2 per trade, lower than FBS's $20 per trade. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day. Crypto fees are typically quoted as maker/taker rates rather than fixed per-trade commissions; check each exchange's fee schedule for volume-based discounts.
Crypto.com supports Proprietary Web/Mobile, while FBS supports MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4. Crypto.com has exclusive access to Proprietary Web/Mobile. FBS has exclusive access to MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4.
Crypto.com scores better on fee criteria (no deposit fee, no inactivity fee). Always check both exchanges' current fee schedules, as maker/taker rates and withdrawal fees vary and are subject to change.
Crypto.com offers staking while FBS does not according to our data. Staking lets you earn passive yield on your crypto holdings directly through the exchange. Check Crypto.com's supported coins, lock-up terms, and estimated yields before committing.
In our data: Crypto.com has DeFi integration; Crypto.com supports NFT trading. DeFi and NFT features vary between platforms. Check each exchange's current Web3 integrations and supported chains before making a decision.
