This comparison pits a crypto-native exchange against a CFD broker on asset depth, pricing transparency, and regulatory footing, highlighting where each excels and where gaps remain.
Find out which crypto exchange best suits your trading profile.
Choose if…
Choose Bitget if you want a native exchange with 800+ listed coins.
Choose if…
Choose FBS if you prefer MT4/MT5 trading and 24/7 multilingual support.
Which exchange wins for each type of crypto trader, based on security, fees, coin selection, and editorial scoring.
| Criteria | ||
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 4.0/ 5 | 3.4/ 5 |
| Min Deposit | No minimum▼ lower | $1 |
| Spreads From | N/A | 0 pips |
| Taker Fee | 0.10%▼ lower | 20.00% |
A closer look at the specific criteria each exchange meets or misses within each scoring category.
| Criteria | Bitget | FBS |
|---|---|---|
| Security | ||
| Cold storage for assets | Pass | Fail |
| Proof of reserves published | Pass | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Fail | Pass |
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, etc.) | Fail | Fail |
| Fees | ||
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Fail |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Fail |
| Features | ||
| Staking available | Pass | Fail |
| DeFi integration | Fail | Fail |
| NFT trading | Fail | Fail |
| 500+ coins listed | Pass | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Fail | Pass |
Bitget rates 4/5 versus 3.4/5 for FBS. Bitget edges ahead on our composite score, though both exchanges meet a reasonable standard for most traders.
FBS lists a spread from 0. Current spread data is not available for Bitget. Check both exchanges' full fee schedules, including maker/taker rates, for up-to-date pricing.
Bitget has no minimum deposit, while FBS requires at least $1. This makes Bitget more accessible for traders looking to start with a smaller crypto investment.
Bitget is regulated by AUSTRAC. FBS is regulated by CySEC, FSCA. Confirm a exchange's current regulatory status on the relevant regulator's public register before opening an account.
For beginners, Bitget has no minimum deposit, removing the capital barrier entirely. Both exchanges otherwise share similar beginner-facing criteria in our data. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources on each exchanges's site.
Bitget offers up to 125:1 on perpetual or margin products, versus FBS's 2:1 cap. Margin and futures trading carry higher risk than spot crypto; confirm product availability and jurisdiction-specific limits on each exchange's website.
Bitget charges $0.1 per trade, lower than FBS's $20 per trade. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day. Crypto fees are typically quoted as maker/taker rates rather than fixed per-trade commissions; check each exchange's fee schedule for volume-based discounts.
Bitget supports Bitget, while FBS supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5. Bitget has exclusive access to Bitget. FBS has exclusive access to MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5.
Bitget scores higher on security criteria, with cold storage and proof of reserves. For crypto, cold storage and proof of reserves are key indicators that client assets are protected against exchange failure or hacks.
Bitget scores better on fee criteria (no deposit fee, no inactivity fee). Always check both exchanges' current fee schedules, as maker/taker rates and withdrawal fees vary and are subject to change.
Bitget offers staking while FBS does not according to our data. Staking lets you earn passive yield on your crypto holdings directly through the exchange. Check Bitget's supported coins, lock-up terms, and estimated yields before committing.
Bitget lists 500+ coins while FBS does not meet this threshold in our data. For traders who want access to many altcoins, Bitget has the broader selection. Confirm specific coin availability for your region on each exchange's website.
Bitget wins for security due to proof of reserves and a user protection fund.
Bitget offers competitive fees with no deposit and no inactivity fees.
Bitget offers staking and yield-earning options while FBS does not, making Bitget the better choice for holders who want to earn passive income on their crypto.
| N/A |
| 2 pips |
| Inactivity Fee | None | None |
|---|
| Deposit Fee | Free (crypto/bank); card fees apply | Free |
|---|
| Deposit methods | CryptoBank transferCredit cardDebit cardP2P | Bank transferCredit cardDebit cardSkrillNetellerFasaPayPerfect Money |
|---|
| Withdrawal methods | CryptoBank transferCredit cardP2P | Bank transferCredit cardSkrillNetellerFasaPayPerfect Money |
|---|
| Withdrawal Fee | Network fee only | Free |
|---|
| Regulators | AUSTRAC | CySEC FSCA IFSC |
|---|
| Cold Storage | Yes | No |
|---|
| Proof of Reserves | Yes | No |
|---|
| Staking | Yes | No |
|---|
| DeFi Integration | No | No |
|---|
| NFT Trading | No | No |
|---|
| 500+ Coins | Yes | No |
|---|
| P2P Trading | Yes | No |
|---|
| Crypto Earn / Savings | Yes | No |
|---|
| Token Launchpad | Yes | No |
|---|
| Active bonuses | 2 offers | None |
|---|
Bitget edges FBS on editorial score, driven by higher category scores, 800+ listed coins, and transparent pricing.
Dig deeper into each broker’s features, fees, and regulation.
Score 3.4 / 5
Personalised recommendation
Answer 6 quick questions and we’ll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker