FP Markets vs Trading 212 Stock Broker Comparison
A head-to-head comparison of FP Markets and Trading 212 across regulation, commissions, platforms, and editorial scoring.
FP Markets offers direct-access share CFD trading via IRESS alongside standard MT4/MT5/cTrader share CFDs - a differentiated dual-model approach under ASIC and CySEC regulation that suits both ECN forex traders and equity-focused clients.
Trading 212 offers one of the UK's best commission-free stock ISA accounts alongside fractional shares and an attractive cash account. Its pies feature enables automated portfolio rebalancing for passive investors.
Trading 212 edges ahead with a score of 4.2/5 vs FP Markets's 4.1/5. A narrow margin, so review the breakdown below to see where each broker has a clear advantage.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of stock trader, based on costs, safety, features, and editorial scoring.
Trading 212 offers commission-free trading while FP Markets does not, making Trading 212 the more cost-effective choice for frequent stock traders.
Both brokers show an equally strong safety profile across regulation, fund protection, and client safeguards.
Trading 212 is better suited for long-term investing: fractional shares, dividend reinvestment.
Both brokers offer equivalent conditions for active trading across commissions, platforms, and charting tools.
Trading 212 edges out FP Markets with a higher editorial score (4.2/5 vs 4.1/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new stock investors.
FP Markets vs Trading 212: Side-by-Side Stock Broker Comparison
| Editorial score | 4.1/ 5 | 4.2/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Min deposit | $100 | $1 |
| Commission-free | No | Yes |
| Fractional shares | No | Yes |
| Dividend reinvestment | No | Yes |
| Extended hours | No | No |
| IPO access | No | No |
| Short selling | Yes | No |
| Regulators | ASIC CySEC | FCA CySEC |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 cTrader TradingView IRESS | Trading 212 App |
| Active bonuses | None | 2 offers |
| Visit broker | Visit FP Markets | Visit Trading 212 |
FP Markets vs Trading 212 Stock Broker Pros & Cons
- IRESS platform provides genuine DMA access to ASX, NYSE, LSE, and other exchanges
- 10,000+ share CFDs available on MT4, MT5, cTrader, and TradingView
- ASIC and CySEC regulation - among the strongest regulatory profiles for a mid-tier broker
- No platform fee for standard share CFD trading (IRESS fee only for DMA users)
- IRESS DMA incurs a monthly fee (~AUD 55) - uneconomical for low-frequency traders
- CFD-only for most share access; DMA limited to IRESS users
- IRESS has a steeper learning curve than MetaTrader or TradingView
- Not available to US residents
- Commission-free real stock and ETF trading
- Stocks & Shares ISA available
- Fractional shares from €1
- Competitive cash interest account (Flexi Cash)
- Automated portfolio pies for passive investing
- Regulated by FCA with FSCS protection
- Limited research tools and market depth data
- No SIPP pension account option
- CFD offering is separate and carries higher risk
- Customer support is primarily app-based
FP Markets vs Trading 212: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
| Criteria | FP Markets | Trading 212 |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, SEC, etc.) | Pass | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS, SIPC) | Pass | Pass |
| Costs | ||
| Commission-free trading | Fail | Pass |
| Features | ||
| Fractional shares | Fail | Pass |
| Dividend reinvestment (DRIP) | Fail | Pass |
| Extended hours trading | Fail | Fail |
| IPO access | Fail | Fail |
| Short selling | Pass | Fail |
| Stock screener tool | Pass | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Fail |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Fail |
| Phone support | Pass | Fail |
FP Markets vs Trading 212: Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our independent editorial scoring, Trading 212 ranks higher with a score of 4.2/5 vs 4.1/5 for FP Markets. The best choice still depends on your needs — commissions, features like fractional shares, and regulatory coverage all matter.
Trading 212 offers commission-free stock trading while FP Markets does not according to our data. Commission-free trading can significantly reduce costs for frequent traders. Always confirm the current fee structure directly on each broker's website.
Both FP Markets and Trading 212 hold top-tier regulatory licences, indicating a high standard of investor protection. Confirm each broker's specific regulatory bodies and compensation scheme coverage to ensure they apply in your jurisdiction.
Trading 212 has a lower minimum deposit of $1, while FP Markets requires at least $100. This makes Trading 212 more accessible for traders starting with limited capital.
FP Markets supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, TradingView, IRESS and Trading 212 offers Trading 212 App. Platform availability affects the tools, charting, and order types available to you. If you rely on a specific platform like MetaTrader or a proprietary web app, confirm compatibility before opening an account.
For beginners: Trading 212 has a lower minimum deposit ($1); Trading 212 has a higher overall editorial score. Also compare educational resources, customer support quality, and the simplicity of each broker's platform before deciding.
More Stock Broker Comparisons
More FP Markets comparisons
Personalised recommendation
Not sure which broker is right for you?
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker