FP Markets vs Saxo Bank Stock Broker Comparison
A head-to-head comparison of FP Markets and Saxo Bank across regulation, commissions, platforms, and editorial scoring.
FP Markets offers direct-access share CFD trading via IRESS alongside standard MT4/MT5/cTrader share CFDs - a differentiated dual-model approach under ASIC and CySEC regulation that suits both ECN forex traders and equity-focused clients.
Saxo Bank offers institutional-grade market access in a polished web platform, making it ideal for sophisticated investors who want access to global stock markets, options, and bonds in a single account.
Saxo Bank edges ahead with a score of 4.5/5 vs FP Markets's 4.1/5. A narrow margin, so review the breakdown below to see where each broker has a clear advantage.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of stock trader, based on costs, safety, features, and editorial scoring.
Both brokers show an equally strong safety profile across regulation, fund protection, and client safeguards.
Saxo Bank is better suited for long-term investing: dividend reinvestment.
FP Markets has the edge for active traders: more platform options, advanced charting.
Saxo Bank edges out FP Markets with a higher editorial score (4.5/5 vs 4.1/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new stock investors.
Commission data is not yet available for this pair. Check each broker's pricing page to compare trading costs directly.
FP Markets vs Saxo Bank: Side-by-Side Stock Broker Comparison
| Editorial score | 4.1/ 5 | 4.5/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Min deposit | $100 | $2,000 |
| Commission-free | No | No |
| Fractional shares | No | No |
| Dividend reinvestment | No | Yes |
| Extended hours | No | Yes |
| IPO access | No | No |
| Short selling | Yes | Yes |
| Regulators | ASIC CySEC | FCA ASIC JFSA SFC MAS ACPR CNMV DFSA FINMA Finansinspektionen Finanstilsynet FSC CBI KNF Finanstilsynet MFSA CMA |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 cTrader TradingView IRESS | Proprietary Web/Mobile SaxoTraderGO |
| Active bonuses | None | 2 offers |
| Visit broker | Visit FP Markets | Visit Saxo Bank |
FP Markets vs Saxo Bank Stock Broker Pros & Cons
- IRESS platform provides genuine DMA access to ASX, NYSE, LSE, and other exchanges
- 10,000+ share CFDs available on MT4, MT5, cTrader, and TradingView
- ASIC and CySEC regulation - among the strongest regulatory profiles for a mid-tier broker
- No platform fee for standard share CFD trading (IRESS fee only for DMA users)
- IRESS DMA incurs a monthly fee (~AUD 55) - uneconomical for low-frequency traders
- CFD-only for most share access; DMA limited to IRESS users
- IRESS has a steeper learning curve than MetaTrader or TradingView
- Not available to US residents
- Access to 60,000+ instruments across 50+ exchanges
- SaxoTraderGO is one of the best web trading platforms available
- Strong multi-jurisdiction regulatory profile (FSA, FCA, MAS)
- Options, bonds, and multi-asset investing in one account
- Professional-grade research and analytics tools
- Higher minimum deposit (£2,000 / €2,000) than most retail brokers
- Commission structure is not the cheapest for smaller accounts
- Complexity of the platform may overwhelm beginner investors
FP Markets vs Saxo Bank: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
| Criteria | FP Markets | Saxo Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, SEC, etc.) | Pass | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS, SIPC) | Pass | Pass |
| Costs | ||
| Commission-free trading | Fail | Fail |
| Features | ||
| Fractional shares | Fail | Fail |
| Dividend reinvestment (DRIP) | Fail | Pass |
| Extended hours trading | Fail | Pass |
| IPO access | Fail | Fail |
| Short selling | Pass | Pass |
| Stock screener tool | Pass | Pass |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Fail |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
FP Markets vs Saxo Bank: Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our independent editorial scoring, Saxo Bank ranks higher with a score of 4.5/5 vs 4.1/5 for FP Markets. The best choice still depends on your needs — commissions, features like fractional shares, and regulatory coverage all matter.
Neither FP Markets nor Saxo Bank is listed as offering commission-free trading in our data. Compare each broker's commission schedule directly, as fees vary by account type and the markets you trade.
Both FP Markets and Saxo Bank hold top-tier regulatory licences, indicating a high standard of investor protection. Confirm each broker's specific regulatory bodies and compensation scheme coverage to ensure they apply in your jurisdiction.
FP Markets has a lower minimum deposit of $100, while Saxo Bank requires at least $2000. This makes FP Markets more accessible for traders starting with limited capital.
FP Markets supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, TradingView, IRESS and Saxo Bank offers Proprietary Web/Mobile, SaxoTraderGO. Platform availability affects the tools, charting, and order types available to you. If you rely on a specific platform like MetaTrader or a proprietary web app, confirm compatibility before opening an account.
For beginners: FP Markets has a lower minimum deposit ($100); Saxo Bank has a higher overall editorial score. Also compare educational resources, customer support quality, and the simplicity of each broker's platform before deciding.
More Stock Broker Comparisons
More FP Markets comparisons
More Saxo Bank comparisons
Personalised recommendation
Not sure which broker is right for you?
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker