Forex.comvs
FP MarketsStock Broker Comparison
Forex.com and FP Markets square off in a stock-focused comparison, weighing platform choices, regulatory profiles, and access to global equities.
Our Verdict
FP Markets winsby 0.2 pts
Forex.com and FP Markets are closely matched. FP Markets provides broader exchange access with 15 exchanges versus Forex.com's 8.
No commercial relationship. The verdict and scores are entirely editorial. No payment influences this comparison.
Key Differences
- 1FP Markets offers a stock screener.
- 2FP Markets provides access to 15 exchanges.
- 3Forex.com has a proprietary platform.
Who should choose Forex.com vs FP Markets?
Find out which stock broker best suits your investing profile.
Choose Forex.com if…
Choose Forex.com if you value US-resident accessibility and a proprietary Web Trader.
Choose FP Markets if…
Choose FP Markets if you want DMA access via IRESS and broader exchange coverage.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of stock trader, based on costs, safety, features, and editorial scoring.
Best for safety & regulation
It’s a tie
Both equally suited
Forex.com earns safety via multi-jurisdiction regulation including NFA, CFTC, FCA, ASIC, MAS, IIROC, and regulator oversight across markets worldwide.
Best for active traders
Recommended
Forex.com vs FP Markets: Side-by-Side Stock Broker Comparison
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 3.9/ 5 | 4.1/ 5 |
| Min deposit | $100 | $100 |
| Spreads from | 1 pips | 0 pips▼ lower |
| Commission / lot | $7/lot | $6/lot▼ lower |
Forex.com vs FP Markets Stock Broker Pros & Cons
Pros
- NFA, CFTC, and FCA regulated, accessible to US residents who cannot use most CFD brokers
- Share CFDs on MT4, MT5, and proprietary Web Trader from a single account
- Reuters news and integrated economic calendar in the Web Trader
- No inactivity fee for actively funded accounts
Cons
- Narrowest stock selection (220+) among regulated multi-platform equity CFD brokers
Forex.com vs FP Markets: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
0
Forex.com
criteria wins
1
FP Markets
criteria win
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
| Criteria | Forex.com | FP Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, SEC, etc.) | Pass | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS, SIPC) | Pass | Pass |
| Costs | ||
| Commission-free trading | Fail | Fail |
| Features | ||
| Fractional shares | Fail | Fail |
| Dividend reinvestment (DRIP) | Fail | Fail |
| Extended hours trading | Fail | Fail |
| IPO access | Fail | Fail |
| Short selling | Pass | Pass |
| Stock screener tool | Fail | Pass |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
Forex.com vs FP Markets: Frequently Asked Questions
The scores are close: Forex.com rates 3.9/5 and FP Markets rates 4.1/5. FP Markets has a marginal edge in our scoring, but the difference is small enough that your specific priorities — fees, platforms, or regulatory jurisdiction — should guide the final choice.
FP Markets lists tighter spreads from 0, compared with Forex.com's 1. For stock trading, also factor in any per-trade or per-share commissions — spreads and commissions together determine the true cost per trade.
Both Forex.com and FP Markets require a minimum deposit of $100 to open a live trading account.
Both Forex.com and FP Markets hold licences from top-tier regulators, indicating a high standard of regulatory oversight. Check each broker's specific regulatory bodies to confirm coverage in your jurisdiction.
For beginners, both brokers provide negative balance protection. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources on each broker's site before deciding.
Forex.com lists maximum leverage of 20:1, while FP Markets lists up to 20:1. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
FP Markets charges $6 per trade, lower than Forex.com's $7 per trade. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day. Stock commissions may be charged as a flat rate per trade or per share; confirm the exact structure on each broker's website.
Forex.com supports MetaTrader 5, Proprietary Web/Mobile, MetaTrader 4, while FP Markets supports cTrader, IRESS, MetaTrader 5, TradingView, MetaTrader 4. Both provide MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4. Forex.com has exclusive access to Proprietary Web/Mobile. FP Markets has exclusive access to cTrader and IRESS and TradingView.
Neither Forex.com nor FP Markets is listed as offering commission-free trading in our data. Compare each broker's commission schedule directly, as fees vary by account type and the markets you trade.
Both Forex.com and FP Markets are covered by a compensation scheme according to our data, providing an additional safety net for your stock investments. Confirm the specific scheme and coverage limit that applies to your account before depositing.
