Capital.com vs FP Markets Stock Broker Comparison
A head-to-head comparison of Capital.com and FP Markets across regulation, commissions, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Capital.com offers share CFDs on 4,000+ global stocks under FCA, ASIC, and CySEC regulation with AI-enhanced trading insights and no commission - one of the widest regulated share CFD selections among multi-asset platforms.
FP Markets offers direct-access share CFD trading via IRESS alongside standard MT4/MT5/cTrader share CFDs - a differentiated dual-model approach under ASIC and CySEC regulation that suits both ECN forex traders and equity-focused clients.
FP Markets edges ahead with a score of 4.1/5 vs Capital.com's 3.9/5. A narrow margin, so review the breakdown below to see where each broker has a clear advantage.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of stock trader, based on costs, safety, features, and editorial scoring.
Capital.com offers commission-free trading while FP Markets does not, making Capital.com the more cost-effective choice for frequent stock traders.
Both brokers show an equally strong safety profile across regulation, fund protection, and client safeguards.
Capital.com has the edge for active traders: commission-free trading, advanced charting.
FP Markets edges out Capital.com with a higher editorial score (4.1/5 vs 3.9/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new stock investors.
Long-term investing feature data (fractional shares, dividend reinvestment, IPO access) is not yet available for this pair.
Capital.com vs FP Markets: Side-by-Side Stock Broker Comparison
| Editorial score | 3.9/ 5 | 4.1/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Min deposit | $20 | $100 |
| Commission-free | Yes | No |
| Fractional shares | No | No |
| Dividend reinvestment | No | No |
| Extended hours | No | No |
| IPO access | No | No |
| Short selling | Yes | Yes |
| Regulators | FCA ASIC MAS CySEC CMA | ASIC CySEC |
| Platforms | Proprietary Web/Mobile | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 cTrader TradingView IRESS |
| Visit broker | Visit Capital.com | Visit FP Markets |
Capital.com vs FP Markets Stock Broker Pros & Cons
- 4,000+ share CFDs across major global exchanges - wider than most regulated multi-asset brokers
- AI trading insights identify behavioural biases in equity trading decisions
- FCA, ASIC, and CySEC regulated with no commission and no minimum deposit
- No inactivity fee; 24/7 customer support
- Share CFDs only - no real ownership, ISA wrapper, dividends, or voting rights
- Spread-only model less transparent than commission plus raw spread for active traders
- No MetaTrader - algorithmic traders cannot use MT4/MT5 Expert Advisors
- Overnight financing costs on leveraged positions accumulate for longer-term holders
- IRESS platform provides genuine DMA access to ASX, NYSE, LSE, and other exchanges
- 10,000+ share CFDs available on MT4, MT5, cTrader, and TradingView
- ASIC and CySEC regulation - among the strongest regulatory profiles for a mid-tier broker
- No platform fee for standard share CFD trading (IRESS fee only for DMA users)
- IRESS DMA incurs a monthly fee (~AUD 55) - uneconomical for low-frequency traders
- CFD-only for most share access; DMA limited to IRESS users
- IRESS has a steeper learning curve than MetaTrader or TradingView
- Not available to US residents
Capital.com vs FP Markets: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
| Criteria | Capital.com | FP Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, SEC, etc.) | Pass | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS, SIPC) | Pass | Pass |
| Costs | ||
| Commission-free trading | Pass | Fail |
| Features | ||
| Fractional shares | Fail | Fail |
| Dividend reinvestment (DRIP) | Fail | Fail |
| Extended hours trading | Fail | Fail |
| IPO access | Fail | Fail |
| Short selling | Pass | Pass |
| Stock screener tool | Pass | Pass |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Fail | Pass |
Capital.com vs FP Markets: Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our independent editorial scoring, FP Markets ranks higher with a score of 4.1/5 vs 3.9/5 for Capital.com. The best choice still depends on your needs — commissions, features like fractional shares, and regulatory coverage all matter.
Capital.com offers commission-free stock trading while FP Markets does not according to our data. Commission-free trading can significantly reduce costs for frequent traders. Always confirm the current fee structure directly on each broker's website.
Both Capital.com and FP Markets hold top-tier regulatory licences, indicating a high standard of investor protection. Confirm each broker's specific regulatory bodies and compensation scheme coverage to ensure they apply in your jurisdiction.
Capital.com has a lower minimum deposit of $20, while FP Markets requires at least $100. This makes Capital.com more accessible for traders starting with limited capital.
Capital.com supports Proprietary Web/Mobile and FP Markets offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, TradingView, IRESS. Platform availability affects the tools, charting, and order types available to you. If you rely on a specific platform like MetaTrader or a proprietary web app, confirm compatibility before opening an account.
For beginners: Capital.com has a lower minimum deposit ($20); FP Markets has a higher overall editorial score. Also compare educational resources, customer support quality, and the simplicity of each broker's platform before deciding.
More Stock Broker Comparisons
More Capital.com comparisons
More FP Markets comparisons
Personalised recommendation
Not sure which broker is right for you?
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker