Capital.comvs
FP MarketsStock Broker Comparison
Capital.com and FP Markets face off on platform approach and cost structures. This clash tests how each broker balances access, regulation, and equity trading ambitions.
Our Verdict
FP Markets winsby 0.2 pts
Capital.com and FP Markets remain closely matched; the clearest differentiator is Capital.com's commission-free trading.
No commercial relationship. The verdict and scores are entirely editorial. No payment influences this comparison.
Key Differences
- 1Commission-free trading on share CFDs.
- 2Capital.com operates a proprietary platform.
- 3Capital.com lists 25 exchanges vs FP Markets' 15.
Who should choose Capital.com vs FP Markets?
Find out which stock broker best suits your investing profile.
Choose Capital.com if…
Choose Capital.com if you want commission-free trading and a proprietary platform.
Choose FP Markets if…
Choose FP Markets if you want direct DMA access via IRESS and a broad CFD offering.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of stock trader, based on costs, safety, features, and editorial scoring.
Best for low cost trading
Recommended
Capital.com is best for low-cost trading due to commission-free share CFDs and a $20 minimum deposit.
Best for safety & regulation
It’s a tie
Both equally suited
Capital.com vs FP Markets: Side-by-Side Stock Broker Comparison
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 3.9/ 5 | 4.1/ 5 |
| Min deposit | $20▼ lower | $100 |
| Spreads from | 0.6 pips | 0 pips▼ lower |
| Commission / lot | N/A | $6/lot |
Capital.com vs FP Markets Stock Broker Pros & Cons
Pros
- 4,000+ share CFDs across major global exchanges, wider than most regulated multi-asset brokers
- AI trading insights identify behavioural biases in equity trading decisions
- FCA, ASIC, and CySEC regulated with no commission and no minimum deposit
- No inactivity fee; 24/7 customer support
Cons
- Share CFDs only, no real ownership, ISA wrapper, dividends, or voting rights
Capital.com vs FP Markets: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
1
Capital.com
criteria win
1
FP Markets
criteria win
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
| Criteria | Capital.com | FP Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, SEC, etc.) | Pass | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS, SIPC) | Pass | Pass |
| Costs | ||
| Commission-free trading | Pass | Fail |
| Features | ||
| Fractional shares | Fail | Fail |
| Dividend reinvestment (DRIP) | Fail | Fail |
| Extended hours trading | Fail | Fail |
| IPO access | Fail | Fail |
| Short selling | Pass | Pass |
| Stock screener tool | Pass | Pass |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Fail | Pass |
Capital.com vs FP Markets: Frequently Asked Questions
The scores are close: Capital.com rates 3.9/5 and FP Markets rates 4.1/5. FP Markets has a marginal edge in our scoring, but the difference is small enough that your specific priorities — fees, platforms, or regulatory jurisdiction — should guide the final choice.
FP Markets lists tighter spreads from 0, compared with Capital.com's 0.6. For stock trading, also factor in any per-trade or per-share commissions — spreads and commissions together determine the true cost per trade.
Capital.com has $20, while FP Markets requires at least $100. This makes Capital.com more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
Both Capital.com and FP Markets hold licences from top-tier regulators, indicating a high standard of regulatory oversight. Check each broker's specific regulatory bodies to confirm coverage in your jurisdiction.
For beginners, two factors stand out: Capital.com requires a lower minimum deposit ($20), lowering the barrier to entry, and both brokers provide negative balance protection. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
Capital.com lists maximum leverage of 20:1, while FP Markets lists up to 20:1. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
FP Markets charges $6 per trade on commission-based accounts. Commission details for Capital.com are not currently available. Check their website for up-to-date pricing. Stock commissions may be charged as a flat rate per trade or per share; confirm the exact structure on each broker's website.
Capital.com supports Proprietary Web/Mobile, while FP Markets supports cTrader, IRESS, MetaTrader 5, TradingView, MetaTrader 4. Capital.com has exclusive access to Proprietary Web/Mobile. FP Markets has exclusive access to cTrader and IRESS and MetaTrader 5 and TradingView and MetaTrader 4.
Capital.com offers commission-free stock trading while FP Markets does not according to our data. Commission-free trading can reduce costs for frequent traders. Always confirm the current fee structure directly on each broker's website.
Both Capital.com and FP Markets are covered by a compensation scheme according to our data, providing an additional safety net for your stock investments. Confirm the specific scheme and coverage limit that applies to your account before depositing.
