Capital.com vs Pepperstone Stock Broker Comparison
A head-to-head comparison of Capital.com and Pepperstone across regulation, commissions, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Capital.com offers share CFDs on 4,000+ global stocks under FCA, ASIC, and CySEC regulation with AI-enhanced trading insights and no commission - one of the widest regulated share CFD selections among multi-asset platforms.
Pepperstone offers share CFDs on 1,000+ global stocks across MT4, MT5, cTrader, and TradingView under FCA and ASIC regulation - a convenient route to equity CFD exposure for existing Pepperstone traders without switching brokers.
Capital.com and Pepperstone are extremely closely matched with scores of 3.9/5 and 3.9/5. The right choice depends on your individual trading priorities.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of stock trader, based on costs, safety, features, and editorial scoring.
Capital.com offers commission-free trading while Pepperstone does not, making Capital.com the more cost-effective choice for frequent stock traders.
Both brokers show an equally strong safety profile across regulation, fund protection, and client safeguards.
Capital.com has the edge for active traders: commission-free trading, advanced charting.
Both brokers share the same editorial score of 3.9/5, but Pepperstone requires a lower minimum deposit ($0 vs $20 for Capital.com), making it more accessible for new investors.
Long-term investing feature data (fractional shares, dividend reinvestment, IPO access) is not yet available for this pair.
Capital.com vs Pepperstone: Side-by-Side Stock Broker Comparison
| Editorial score | 3.9/ 5 | 3.9/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Min deposit | $20 | No minimum |
| Commission-free | Yes | No |
| Fractional shares | No | No |
| Dividend reinvestment | No | No |
| Extended hours | No | No |
| IPO access | No | No |
| Short selling | Yes | Yes |
| Regulators | FCA ASIC MAS CySEC CMA | FCA ASIC CySEC DFSA BaFin FMA |
| Platforms | Proprietary Web/Mobile | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 cTrader TradingView IRESS |
| Visit broker | Visit Capital.com | Visit Pepperstone |
Capital.com vs Pepperstone Stock Broker Pros & Cons
- 4,000+ share CFDs across major global exchanges - wider than most regulated multi-asset brokers
- AI trading insights identify behavioural biases in equity trading decisions
- FCA, ASIC, and CySEC regulated with no commission and no minimum deposit
- No inactivity fee; 24/7 customer support
- Share CFDs only - no real ownership, ISA wrapper, dividends, or voting rights
- Spread-only model less transparent than commission plus raw spread for active traders
- No MetaTrader - algorithmic traders cannot use MT4/MT5 Expert Advisors
- Overnight financing costs on leveraged positions accumulate for longer-term holders
- 1,000+ share CFDs on MT4, MT5, cTrader, and TradingView - same account as forex
- FCA, ASIC, CySEC, BaFin, and DFSA regulated - deepest multi-regulatory profile among ECN brokers
- IRESS available for DMA access to ASX and global equity markets
- Transparent commission structure on share CFDs (0.07%/side, min £7 on UK shares)
- 1,000+ stock selection narrower than CMC Markets (10,000+) or dedicated stockbrokers
- No real share ownership, ISA wrapper, or dividend reinvestment programme
- IRESS DMA incurs a monthly fee for lower-volume traders
- Not suitable as a primary equity broker for buy-and-hold investors
Capital.com vs Pepperstone: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
| Criteria | Capital.com | Pepperstone |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, SEC, etc.) | Pass | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS, SIPC) | Pass | Pass |
| Costs | ||
| Commission-free trading | Pass | Fail |
| Features | ||
| Fractional shares | Fail | Fail |
| Dividend reinvestment (DRIP) | Fail | Fail |
| Extended hours trading | Fail | Fail |
| IPO access | Fail | Fail |
| Short selling | Pass | Pass |
| Stock screener tool | Pass | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Fail | Fail |
Capital.com vs Pepperstone: Frequently Asked Questions
Capital.com and Pepperstone share the same editorial score of 3.9/5. The right choice depends on your priorities: commissions, fractional shares, account features, or regulatory safety.
Capital.com offers commission-free stock trading while Pepperstone does not according to our data. Commission-free trading can significantly reduce costs for frequent traders. Always confirm the current fee structure directly on each broker's website.
Both Capital.com and Pepperstone hold top-tier regulatory licences, indicating a high standard of investor protection. Confirm each broker's specific regulatory bodies and compensation scheme coverage to ensure they apply in your jurisdiction.
Pepperstone has a lower minimum deposit of no minimum required, while Capital.com requires at least $20. This makes Pepperstone more accessible for traders starting with limited capital.
Capital.com supports Proprietary Web/Mobile and Pepperstone offers MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, TradingView, IRESS. Platform availability affects the tools, charting, and order types available to you. If you rely on a specific platform like MetaTrader or a proprietary web app, confirm compatibility before opening an account.
For beginners: Pepperstone has a lower minimum deposit (no minimum). Also compare educational resources, customer support quality, and the simplicity of each broker's platform before deciding.
More Stock Broker Comparisons
More Capital.com comparisons
Personalised recommendation
Not sure which broker is right for you?
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker