easyMarketsvs
Trading 212Stock Broker Comparison
Two brokers frame a clash between fixed spread risk management and activity-focused pricing versus commission-free stock trading and fractional ownership. The tension centers on cost, investment features, and regulatory safety.
Our Verdict
Trading 212 winsClear Winner
Trading 212 leads on the editorial score against easyMarkets, offering commission-free trading and fractional shares while easyMarkets relies on fixed spreads and risk tools.
Trading 212
4.2/5
easyMarkets
3.4/5
Key Differences
- 1Trading 212 offers commission-free stock trading and fractional shares.
- 2easyMarkets provides 24/5 live chat and phone support.
- 3easyMarkets provides access to four exchanges, more than Trading 212.
Who should choose easyMarkets vs Trading 212?
Find out which stock broker best suits your investing profile.
Choose easyMarkets if…
Choose easyMarkets if you want 24/5 live chat and phone support for timely assistance. You gain access to short selling and advanced charting, plus four exchanges, and fixed share CFD spreads with dealCancellation acting as risk protection.
Choose Trading 212 if…
Choose Trading 212 if you want commission-free stock trading and access to fractional shares. You also benefit from a Stocks & Shares ISA and a straightforward app experience under FCA regulation and solid support, plus access to a cash account.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of stock trader, based on costs, safety, features, and editorial scoring.
Best for low cost trading
Recommended
Trading 212 is best for low-cost trading due to commission-free stock and ETF trades.
Best for safety & regulation
easyMarkets vs Trading 212: Side-by-Side Stock Broker Comparison
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 3.4/ 5 | 4.2/ 5 |
| Min deposit | $25 | $1▼ lower |
| Spreads from | 0.7 pips | N/A |
| Commission / lot | N/A | N/A |
| Inactivity fee | None | None |
| Deposit fee |
easyMarkets vs Trading 212 Stock Broker Pros & Cons
Pros
- Fixed spreads on share CFDs eliminate re-quote risk during earnings events
- dealCancellation provides insurance against sharp equity moves
- CySEC and ASIC regulated with compensation scheme coverage
Cons
- Fixed spreads wider than ECN alternatives for active equity traders
- Share CFD selection is limited vs dedicated equity platforms
easyMarkets vs Trading 212: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
4
easyMarkets
criteria wins
3
Trading 212
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
| Criteria | easyMarkets | Trading 212 |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, SEC, etc.) | Pass | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS, SIPC) | Pass | Pass |
| Costs | ||
| Commission-free trading | Fail | Pass |
| No deposit fee | — | Pass |
| Features | ||
| Fractional shares | Fail | Pass |
| Dividend reinvestment (DRIP) | Fail | Pass |
| Extended hours trading | Fail | Fail |
| IPO access | Fail | Fail |
| Short selling | Pass | Fail |
| Stock screener tool | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Fail |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Fail |
| Phone support | Pass | Fail |
easyMarkets vs Trading 212: Frequently Asked Questions
Trading 212 rates 4.2/5 versus 3.4/5 for easyMarkets. Trading 212 edges ahead on our composite score, though both brokers meet a reasonable standard for most traders.
easyMarkets starts from 0.7. Current spread data is not available for Trading 212. Check both brokers' websites for up-to-date spread and commission pricing.
Trading 212 has $1, while easyMarkets requires at least $25. This makes Trading 212 more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
Both easyMarkets and Trading 212 hold licences from top-tier regulators, indicating a high standard of regulatory oversight. Check each broker's specific regulatory bodies to confirm coverage in your jurisdiction.
For beginners, two factors stand out: Trading 212 requires a lower minimum deposit ($1), lowering the barrier to entry, and both brokers provide negative balance protection. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
easyMarkets lists maximum leverage of 400:1, while Trading 212 lists up to 1:5. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
easyMarkets supports MetaTrader 5, Proprietary Web/Mobile, MetaTrader 4, while Trading 212 supports Trading 212 App. easyMarkets has exclusive access to MetaTrader 5 and Proprietary Web/Mobile and MetaTrader 4. Trading 212 has exclusive access to Trading 212 App.
Trading 212 offers commission-free stock trading while easyMarkets does not according to our data. Commission-free trading can reduce costs for frequent traders. Always confirm the current fee structure directly on each broker's website.
Both easyMarkets and Trading 212 are covered by a compensation scheme according to our data, providing an additional safety net for your stock investments. Confirm the specific scheme and coverage limit that applies to your account before depositing.
