AMarketsvs
Interactive BrokersStock Broker Comparison
AMarkets and Interactive Brokers square off on cost, access, and platforms. The contrast highlights how offshore regulation meets broad global reach.
Our Verdict
Interactive Brokers winsClear Winner
Interactive Brokers edges AMarkets on overall editorial score, driven by top-tier regulation, broader exchange access, and lower trading costs for active traders.
Interactive Brokers
4.8/5
AMarkets
3.2/5
Key Differences
- 1Interactive Brokers provides access to 150 exchanges; AMarkets has four.
- 2IBKR Lite offers commission-free US stock trading; AMarkets does not.
- 3IBKR uses a proprietary platform; AMarkets relies on MT4/MT5 and cTrader.
Who should choose AMarkets vs Interactive Brokers?
Find out which stock broker best suits your investing profile.
Choose AMarkets if…
Choose AMarkets if you prefer stocks CFDs with ECN pricing and MT4/MT5 with copy trading, plus a broad range of equity CFDs.
Choose Interactive Brokers if…
Choose Interactive Brokers if you need access to 150 exchanges and IPO access, plus a powerful, configurable proprietary platform.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of stock trader, based on costs, safety, features, and editorial scoring.
Best for low cost trading
Recommended
Interactive Brokers wins for low cost trading, offering commission-free US stocks via IBKR Lite.
Best for safety & regulation
Recommended
AMarkets vs Interactive Brokers: Side-by-Side Stock Broker Comparison
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 3.2/ 5 | 4.8/ 5 |
| Min deposit | $100 | No minimum▼ lower |
| Spreads from | 0 pips▼ lower | 0.2 pips |
| Commission / lot | $6/lot | $2/lot▼ lower |
AMarkets vs Interactive Brokers Stock Broker Pros & Cons
Pros
- Stocks CFDs with ECN pricing and competitive spreads
- MT4/MT5 with copy trading integration
- Broad product range including equity CFDs alongside forex
Cons
- Offshore regulation (SVG/FSA), minimal investor protection
- No real share ownership, CFDs only
AMarkets vs Interactive Brokers: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
0
AMarkets
criteria wins
7
Interactive Brokers
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
| Criteria | AMarkets | Interactive Brokers |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, SEC, etc.) | Fail | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Fail | Fail |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS, SIPC) | Fail | Fail |
| Costs | ||
| Commission-free trading | Fail | Pass |
| Features | ||
| Fractional shares | Fail | Pass |
| Dividend reinvestment (DRIP) | Fail | Pass |
| Extended hours trading | Fail | Pass |
| IPO access | Fail | Pass |
| Short selling | Pass | Pass |
| Stock screener tool | Fail | Pass |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
AMarkets vs Interactive Brokers: Frequently Asked Questions
Interactive Brokers is the stronger choice: it rates 4.8/5 versus 3.2/5 for AMarkets, a gap that reflects clear differences across regulation, fees, and platform quality in our review.
AMarkets lists tighter spreads from 0, compared with Interactive Brokers's 0.2. For stock trading, also factor in any per-trade or per-share commissions — spreads and commissions together determine the true cost per trade.
Interactive Brokers has no minimum deposit, while AMarkets requires at least $100. This makes Interactive Brokers more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
Interactive Brokers holds top-tier regulation (JFSA, IIROC, DFSA), providing stronger investor protections. AMarkets may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
For beginners, Interactive Brokers has no minimum deposit, removing the capital barrier entirely. Both brokers otherwise share similar beginner-facing criteria in our data. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources on each brokers's site.
AMarkets lists maximum leverage of 3000:1, while Interactive Brokers lists up to 1:4. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
Interactive Brokers charges $2 per trade, lower than AMarkets's $6 per trade. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day. Stock commissions may be charged as a flat rate per trade or per share; confirm the exact structure on each broker's website.
AMarkets supports cTrader, MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4, while Interactive Brokers supports Trader Workstation (TWS), Proprietary Web/Mobile. AMarkets has exclusive access to cTrader and MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4. Interactive Brokers has exclusive access to Trader Workstation (TWS) and Proprietary Web/Mobile.
Interactive Brokers offers commission-free stock trading while AMarkets does not according to our data. Commission-free trading can reduce costs for frequent traders. Always confirm the current fee structure directly on each broker's website.
