Two brokers are compared on trust, fees, platforms, and instrument availability. InstaForex offers a very low minimum and cent accounts, while TMGM emphasizes regulatory stature and broader product access.
TMGM edges InstaForex on the editorial score. Its higher score reflects MT4/MT5 access, segregated funds, and a larger instrument universe.
Find out which broker best suits your trader profile.
Choose InstaForex if…
Choose InstaForex if you want cent accounts and a $1 micro-lot entry.
Choose TMGM if…
Choose TMGM if you want MT4 and MT5 access, segregated funds, and a broad instrument universe.
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
TMGM offers tighter spreads from 0.00 pips vs 1.00 pips for InstaForex, reducing trading costs.
| Editorial score | 3.6/ 5 | 4.0/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 3.2 / 5 | 4.3 / 5▲ |
Pros
17+ years in operation, extensive track record
Cent accounts for micro-lot trading from $1
Very low minimum deposit
Large partner and IB network across Asia and CIS
No deposit fees
No inactivity fee
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
| Criteria | InstaForex | TMGM |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Fail | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Fail | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Fail | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Fail | Fail |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Fail | Pass |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Fail | Pass |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Fail | Pass |
| Proprietary platform | Fail | Fail |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Fail | Pass |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
| Multilingual support | Pass | Pass |
The scores are close: InstaForex rates 3.6/5 and TMGM rates 4/5. TMGM has a marginal edge in our scoring, but the difference is small enough that your specific priorities — fees, platforms, or regulatory jurisdiction — should guide the final choice.
TMGM starts from 0 pips, tighter than InstaForex's 1 pips. Tighter spreads lower the cost per trade, which matters most for high-frequency and scalping strategies.
InstaForex has $1, while TMGM requires at least $100. This makes InstaForex more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
TMGM holds top-tier regulation (ASIC, VFSC), providing stronger investor protections. InstaForex may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
For beginners, two factors stand out: InstaForex requires a lower minimum deposit ($1), lowering the barrier to entry, and TMGM provides negative balance protection, capping losses at your deposit amount. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
InstaForex lists maximum leverage of 1000:1, while TMGM lists up to 500:1. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
TMGM charges $7 per lot on commission-based accounts. Commission details for InstaForex are not currently available. Check their website for up-to-date pricing.
InstaForex supports MetaTrader 4, while TMGM supports IRESS, MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4. Both provide MetaTrader 4. TMGM has exclusive access to IRESS and MetaTrader 5.
TMGM wins for safety and regulation due to ASIC oversight and segregated client funds.
TMGM suits active traders with a wide instrument range and raw spreads.
TMGM is better suited for scalpers: raw/ECN spreads available, tighter spreads from 0.00 pips.
InstaForex is best for beginners due to very low minimum deposit and cent accounts.
Fees & Spreads 30% weight | 3.4 / 5 | 4.3 / 5▲ |
|---|
Platforms & Tools 20% weight | 3.3 / 5 | 4.2 / 5▲ |
|---|
Customer Support 10% weight | 3.5 / 5 | 4.1 / 5▲ |
|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2013 |
|---|
| Headquarters | Road Town, British Virgin Islands | Melbourne, Australia |
|---|
| Min Deposit | $1▼ lower | $100 |
|---|
| Spreads From | 1 pips | 0 pips▼ lower |
|---|
| Commission / lot | N/A | $7/lot |
|---|
| N/A | 0.7 pips |
| Max Leverage | 1,000:1 | 500:1▲ higher |
|---|
| Inactivity Fee | None | None |
|---|
| Deposit Fee | Free | Free |
|---|
| Deposit methods | Bank transferCredit cardDebit cardSkrillNetellerWebMoneyPerfect MoneyCrypto | Bank transferCredit cardDebit cardCrypto |
|---|
| Withdrawal methods | Bank transferCredit cardSkrillNetellerWebMoneyPerfect MoneyCrypto | Bank transferCredit cardCrypto |
|---|
| Withdrawal Fee | Free | Free |
|---|
| Regulators | FSC BVI CySEC | ASIC VFSC |
|---|
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4 | IRESS MetaTrader 5 MetaTrader 4 |
|---|
| Active bonuses |
|---|
Mobile trading app available
24/5 live chat support
Phone support available
Multilingual customer support
Pros
10,000+ instruments including real equities via IRESS DMA
ASIC regulated, Tier 1 Australian investor protections
ECN Edge account: raw spreads from 0.0 pips at $7 commission
Strong multilingual support for Asian clients
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Negative balance protection
No deposit fees
No inactivity fee
MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported
Mobile trading app available
Advanced charting tools included
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Phone support available
Cons
FSC BVI only, offshore licence, limited investor protection
Spreads not competitive with ECN brokers
Platform limited to MT4, no MT5, cTrader, or proprietary option
Service quality reviews are mixed on independent forums
No top-tier regulatory licence
Client funds not segregated
No negative balance protection
No investor compensation scheme
No raw spread account option
No MetaTrader support
Limited charting capabilities
Pricing transparency could be improved
Cons
$100 minimum deposit on standard accounts
Less brand recognition than IC Markets or Pepperstone in Australia
IRESS DMA platform requires separate setup
No investor compensation scheme
No proprietary platform
Dig deeper into each broker’s features, fees, and regulation.
Score 3.6 / 5
Personalised recommendation
Answer 6 quick questions and we’ll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker