A head-to-head comparison of FBS and IG across security, fees, coin selection, staking, and editorial scoring.
FBS offers crypto CFDs with extremely high leverage and a near-zero minimum deposit - a popular choice across Asia and the CIS region, though regulated primarily in an offshore jurisdiction.
IG comes out ahead with an editorial score of 4.2/5 compared to FBS's 3.4/5.
Which exchange wins for each type of crypto trader, based on security, fees, coin selection, and editorial scoring.
Both exchanges offer equivalent fee conditions — no deposit fee and no inactivity fee.
IG edges out FBS with a higher editorial score (4.2/5 vs 3.4/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new crypto traders.
Coin-selection data is not yet available for this pair. Check each exchange's supported assets page to compare the number of tradeable cryptocurrencies.
DeFi and NFT feature data is not yet available for this pair. Check each exchange's Web3 product pages directly.
| Criteria | ||
|---|---|---|
| Editorial Score | 3.4/ 5 | 4.2/ 5 |
| Min. Deposit | $1 | No minimum |
| Regulators | CySEC IFSC FSCA | ASIC DFSA CMVM Finansinspektionen Finanstilsynet FCA BaFin CBI FMA Finanstilsynet KNF |
| Cold Storage | No | No |
| Proof of Reserves | No | No |
| Staking | No | No |
| DeFi Integration | No | No |
| NFT Trading | No | No |
| 500+ Coins | No | No |
| P2P Trading | No | No |
| Crypto Earn / Savings | No | No |
| Token Launchpad | No | No |
| Visit exchange | Visit FBS | Visit IG |
A closer look at the specific criteria each exchange meets or misses within each scoring category.
| Criteria | FBS | IG |
|---|---|---|
| Security | ||
| Cold storage for assets | Fail | Fail |
| Proof of reserves published | Fail | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, etc.) | Fail | Pass |
| Fees | ||
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Fail | Fail |
| Transparent pricing page | Fail | Pass |
| Features | ||
| Staking available | Fail | Fail |
| DeFi integration | Fail | Fail |
| NFT trading | Fail | Fail |
| 500+ coins listed | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Fail |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
Based on our independent editorial scoring, IG ranks higher with a score of 4.2/5 vs 3.4/5 for FBS. The best choice still depends on your individual needs — security, coin selection, fees, and staking offerings all matter.
IG scores higher on our security criteria. When evaluating exchange safety, look for cold storage, proof of reserves, regulatory oversight, and segregated client funds. Always verify the current security posture directly with the exchange.
FBS and IG appear similar on fee criteria in our data. Compare each exchange's trading fee schedule directly, as crypto fees vary by asset, volume tier, and payment method.
Neither FBS nor IG is listed as offering staking in our data. Check each exchange's website directly for the most up-to-date staking offerings, as this feature changes frequently.
IG has a lower minimum deposit of no minimum required, while FBS requires at least $1. This makes IG more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
For beginners: IG has a lower minimum deposit (no minimum); IG has a higher overall editorial score. Also consider each exchange's educational resources, customer support quality, and the simplicity of their user interface before deciding.
Personalised recommendation
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker