In a head-to-head comparison, Charles Schwab and FP Markets bring contrasting strengths: Schwab leans on commission-free trading and a robust research stack, while FP Markets emphasizes DMA access and regulation.
Find out which stock broker best suits your investing profile.
Choose if…
Choose Charles Schwab if you want commission-free trades and fractional shares.
Choose if…
Choose FP Markets if you need DMA access via IRESS and strong regulation.
Which broker wins for each type of stock trader, based on costs, safety, features, and editorial scoring.
| Editorial score | 4.6/ 5 | 4.1/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Min deposit | N/A | $100 |
| Spreads from | N/A | 0 pips |
| Commission / lot | N/A | $6/lot |
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
| Criteria | Charles Schwab | FP Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, SEC, etc.) | Pass | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Fail | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS, SIPC) | Fail | Pass |
| Costs | ||
| Commission-free trading | Pass | Fail |
| No deposit fee | Pass | — |
| Features | ||
| Fractional shares | Pass | Fail |
| Dividend reinvestment (DRIP) | Pass | Fail |
| Extended hours trading | Pass | Fail |
| IPO access | Pass | Fail |
| Short selling | Pass | Pass |
| Stock screener tool | Pass | Pass |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
Charles Schwab rates 4.6/5 versus 4.1/5 for FP Markets. Charles Schwab edges ahead on our composite score, though both brokers meet a reasonable standard for most traders.
FP Markets starts from 0. Current spread data is not available for Charles Schwab. Check both brokers' websites for up-to-date spread and commission pricing.
FP Markets requires $100. Minimum deposit information is not currently available for Charles Schwab.
Both Charles Schwab and FP Markets hold licences from top-tier regulators, indicating a high standard of regulatory oversight. Check each broker's specific regulatory bodies to confirm coverage in your jurisdiction.
For beginners, FP Markets provides negative balance protection, capping losses at your deposit amount. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources on each broker's site before deciding.
Charles Schwab lists maximum leverage of 1:4, while FP Markets lists up to 20:1. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
FP Markets charges $6 per trade on commission-based accounts. Commission details for Charles Schwab are not currently available. Check their website for up-to-date pricing. Stock commissions may be charged as a flat rate per trade or per share; confirm the exact structure on each broker's website.
Charles Schwab supports thinkorswim, Proprietary Web/Mobile, while FP Markets supports IRESS, cTrader, MetaTrader 5, TradingView, MetaTrader 4. Charles Schwab has exclusive access to thinkorswim and Proprietary Web/Mobile. FP Markets has exclusive access to IRESS and cTrader and MetaTrader 5 and TradingView and MetaTrader 4.
Charles Schwab offers commission-free stock trading while FP Markets does not according to our data. Commission-free trading can reduce costs for frequent traders. Always confirm the current fee structure directly on each broker's website.
FP Markets scores higher on investor protection criteria, with compensation scheme coverage and segregated client funds. For stock investors, confirming compensation scheme coverage ensures your assets are protected up to a defined limit if the broker becomes insolvent.
Charles Schwab wins for low cost trading thanks to commission-free US stock and ETF trading.
Charles Schwab wins for long-term investors with DRIP and fractional shares.
Charles Schwab wins for active traders with thinkorswim and strong research.
Charles Schwab wins for beginners with no account minimum and fractional shares.
FP Markets wins for global access with 15 exchanges and DMA options.
| N/A |
| 0.6 pips |
| Inactivity fee | None | None |
|---|
| Deposit fee | Free | Free |
|---|
| Deposit methods | Bank transferACHWire transferCheque | Bank transferCredit cardDebit cardSkrillNetellerPOLiPayPal |
|---|
| Withdrawal methods | Bank transferACHWire transferCheque | Bank transferCredit cardSkrillNetellerPOLi |
|---|
| Withdrawal fee | Free ACH; $25 wire transfer | Free |
|---|
| Commission-free | Yes | No |
|---|
| Fractional shares | Yes | No |
|---|
| Dividend reinvestment | Yes | No |
|---|
| Extended hours | Yes | No |
|---|
| IPO access | Yes | No |
|---|
| Short selling | Yes | Yes |
|---|
| Regulators | SEC FINRA | ASIC CySEC |
|---|
| Platforms | thinkorswim Proprietary Web/Mobile | IRESS cTrader MetaTrader 5 TradingView MetaTrader 4 |
|---|
| Active bonuses | 2 offers | None |
|---|
Charles Schwab edges FP Markets on editorial score and offers commission-free trading plus fractional shares and a broad research stack. FP Markets provides DMA access via IRESS and strong regulation, but the score gap favors Schwab.
Dig deeper into each broker’s features, fees, and regulation.
Score 4.1 / 5
Personalised recommendation
Answer 6 quick questions and we’ll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker