ACY Securitiesvs
FP MarketsStock Broker Comparison
ACY Securities and FP Markets face off in a battle over regulation, platform breadth, and global share access. The outcome hinges on where you value trust, tools, and exchange reach.
Our Verdict
FP Markets winsby 0.5 pts
FP Markets edges ACY Securities on editorial score, supported by stronger trust and regulation and higher category scores.
No commercial relationship. The verdict and scores are entirely editorial. No payment influences this comparison.
Key Differences
- 1FP Markets offers 15 exchanges, while ACY Securities supports 5.
- 2FP Markets provides 24/5 live chat; ACY Securities does not.
- 3FP Markets operates a compensation scheme; ACY Securities does not.
Who should choose ACY Securities vs FP Markets?
Find out which stock broker best suits your investing profile.
Choose ACY Securities if…
Choose ACY Securities if you want ASIC regulation with negative balance protection and ECN execution on share CFDs.
Choose FP Markets if…
Choose FP Markets if you value 24/5 live chat, robust research tools, and access to 15 exchanges through IRESS.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of stock trader, based on costs, safety, features, and editorial scoring.
Best for safety & regulation
Recommended
FP Markets leads due to dual ASIC and CySEC regulation.
Best for active traders
Recommended
ACY Securities vs FP Markets: Side-by-Side Stock Broker Comparison
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 3.6/ 5 | 4.1/ 5 |
| Min deposit | $50▼ lower | $100 |
| Spreads from | 0 pips | 0 pips |
| Commission / lot | $7/lot | $6/lot▼ lower |
ACY Securities vs FP Markets Stock Broker Pros & Cons
Pros
- ASIC regulated with negative balance protection and segregated funds
- ECN execution on share CFDs with competitive pricing
- MT4/MT5 with full professional charting toolkit
Cons
- Limited share CFD selection vs dedicated stock brokers
- No real share ownership, CFDs only
ACY Securities vs FP Markets: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
0
ACY Securities
criteria wins
3
FP Markets
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
| Criteria | ACY Securities | FP Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, SEC, etc.) | Pass | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS, SIPC) | Fail | Pass |
| Costs | ||
| Commission-free trading | Fail | Fail |
| Features | ||
| Fractional shares | Fail | Fail |
| Dividend reinvestment (DRIP) | Fail | Fail |
| Extended hours trading | Fail | Fail |
| IPO access | Fail | Fail |
| Short selling | Pass | Pass |
| Stock screener tool | Fail | Pass |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Fail | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
ACY Securities vs FP Markets: Frequently Asked Questions
The scores are close: ACY Securities rates 3.6/5 and FP Markets rates 4.1/5. FP Markets has a marginal edge in our scoring, but the difference is small enough that your specific priorities — fees, platforms, or regulatory jurisdiction — should guide the final choice.
Both ACY Securities and FP Markets start from the same spread of 0. For stock trading, also compare per-trade or per-share commissions to determine the total cost per transaction.
ACY Securities has $50, while FP Markets requires at least $100. This makes ACY Securities more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
Both ACY Securities and FP Markets hold licences from top-tier regulators, indicating a high standard of regulatory oversight. Check each broker's specific regulatory bodies to confirm coverage in your jurisdiction.
For beginners, two factors stand out: ACY Securities requires a lower minimum deposit ($50), lowering the barrier to entry, and both brokers provide negative balance protection. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
ACY Securities lists maximum leverage of 500:1, while FP Markets lists up to 20:1. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
FP Markets charges $6 per trade, lower than ACY Securities's $7 per trade. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day. Stock commissions may be charged as a flat rate per trade or per share; confirm the exact structure on each broker's website.
ACY Securities supports MetaTrader 5, TradingView, MetaTrader 4, while FP Markets supports cTrader, IRESS, MetaTrader 5, TradingView, MetaTrader 4. Both provide MetaTrader 5 and TradingView and MetaTrader 4. FP Markets has exclusive access to cTrader and IRESS.
Neither ACY Securities nor FP Markets is listed as offering commission-free trading in our data. Compare each broker's commission schedule directly, as fees vary by account type and the markets you trade.
FP Markets scores higher on investor protection criteria, with compensation scheme coverage and segregated client funds. For stock investors, confirming compensation scheme coverage ensures your assets are protected up to a defined limit if the broker becomes insolvent.
