Interactive Brokersvs
SpreadexForex Broker Comparison
Two brokers compete on regulation, costs, and platform depth across global access versus UK spread betting.
Who should choose Interactive Brokers vs Spreadex?
Find out which broker best suits your trader profile.
Choose if…
You choose Interactive Brokers for raw spreads and broad instrument access. You choose Spreadex for TradingView integration and FCA-regulated UK spread betting.
Choose if…
You choose Interactive Brokers for raw spreads and broad instrument access. You choose Spreadex for TradingView integration and FCA-regulated UK spread betting.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Best for low cost trading
Recommended
Interactive Brokers vs Spreadex: Side-by-Side Forex Broker Comparison
Score
= highlighted score shows which broker leads in that category| Editorial score | 4.6/ 5 | 4.0/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 4.8 / 5▲ | 4.5 / 5 |
Interactive Brokers vs Spreadex Forex Broker Pros & Cons
Pros
Available to US residents
Lowest margin rates in industry
150+ global markets
Regulated by top-tier authorities (FCA, ASIC, CySEC)
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Negative balance protection
Interactive Brokers vs Spreadex: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
2
Interactive Brokers
criteria wins
0
Spreadex
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
| Criteria | Interactive Brokers | Spreadex |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Pass | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Pass | Pass |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Pass | Fail |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Fail | Fail |
| Proprietary platform | Pass | Pass |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Pass |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Fail | Fail |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
| Multilingual support | Pass | Fail |
Interactive Brokers vs Spreadex: Frequently Asked Questions
Interactive Brokers rates 4.6/5 versus 4/5 for Spreadex. Interactive Brokers edges ahead on our composite score, though both brokers meet a reasonable standard for most traders.
Interactive Brokers starts from 0.2 pips, tighter than Spreadex's 0.6 pips. Tighter spreads lower the cost per trade, which matters most for high-frequency and scalping strategies.
Neither Interactive Brokers nor Spreadex requires a minimum deposit, making both accessible regardless of starting capital.
Both Interactive Brokers and Spreadex hold licences from top-tier regulators, indicating a high standard of regulatory oversight. Check each broker's specific regulatory bodies to confirm coverage in your jurisdiction.
For beginners, both brokers provide negative balance protection. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources on each broker's site before deciding.
Interactive Brokers lists maximum leverage of 50:1, while Spreadex lists up to 30:1. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
Interactive Brokers charges $2 per lot on commission-based accounts. Commission details for Spreadex are not currently available. Check their website for up-to-date pricing.
Interactive Brokers supports Trader Workstation (TWS), Proprietary Web/Mobile, while Spreadex supports Proprietary Web/Mobile, TradingView. Both provide Proprietary Web/Mobile. Interactive Brokers has exclusive access to Trader Workstation (TWS). Spreadex has exclusive access to TradingView.
