Two brokers present a clash of regulatory footprints and product scopes. City Index offers global regulation and broad markets, while TPFx focuses on Indonesian licensing.
City Index edges ahead overall on regulation, investor protection, and market breadth. TPFx trails in instrument scope and compensation.
Find out which broker best suits your trader profile.
Choose City Index if…
Choose City Index if you want top-tier regulation and a broad instrument universe.
Choose TPFx if…
Choose TPFx if you prefer raw spreads and domestic Indonesian licensing.
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
City Index offers tighter spreads from 0.50 pips vs 1.50 pips for TPFx, reducing trading costs.
| Editorial score | 4.2/ 5 | 3.7/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 4.6 / 5▲ | 3.7 / 5 |
Pros
FCA-regulated since 1983, backed by Nasdaq-listed StoneX Group
13,500+ markets including UK spread betting
TradingView integration for chart-based order execution
EUR/USD from 0.5 pips, competitive for a spread-only desk
FSCS protection up to GBP 85,000 for UK clients
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
| Criteria | City Index | TPFx |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Pass | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Fail |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Pass | Fail |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Fail | Pass |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Fail | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Pass | Pass |
| Proprietary platform | Pass | Pass |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Fail |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
| Multilingual support | Fail | Fail |
City Index rates 4.2/5 versus 3.7/5 for TPFx. City Index edges ahead on our composite score, though both brokers meet a reasonable standard for most traders.
City Index starts from 0.5 pips, tighter than TPFx's 1.5 pips. Tighter spreads lower the cost per trade, which matters most for high-frequency and scalping strategies.
City Index has no minimum deposit, while TPFx requires at least $60. This makes City Index more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
City Index holds top-tier regulation (ASIC, FCA, MAS), providing stronger investor protections. TPFx may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
City Index stands out for beginners: it has a lower entry point and provides negative balance protection, which caps losses at your deposited amount. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
City Index lists maximum leverage of 30:1, while TPFx lists up to 100:1. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
City Index supports TradingView, MetaTrader 4, Proprietary Web/Mobile, while TPFx supports MetaTrader 5, Proprietary Web/Mobile. Both provide Proprietary Web/Mobile. City Index has exclusive access to TradingView and MetaTrader 4. TPFx has exclusive access to MetaTrader 5.
City Index wins for safety and regulation with FCA/ASIC/MAS oversight and investor compensation protections.
City Index wins for active traders thanks to advanced charting and broad instrument coverage.
TPFx is better suited for scalpers: raw/ECN spreads available.
City Index provides MT4, MT5, and TradingView integration for flexible trading.
City Index provides investor protection, segregated funds and FCA-regulated legitimacy that helps beginners.
City Index offers far more markets, expanding opportunities beyond forex.
Fees & Spreads 30% weight | 4.3 / 5▲ | 3.7 / 5 |
|---|
Platforms & Tools 20% weight | 4.2 / 5▲ | 3.7 / 5 |
|---|
Customer Support 10% weight | 4.1 / 5▲ | 3.7 / 5 |
|---|
| Founded | 1983 | 2010 |
|---|
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Jakarta, Indonesia |
|---|
| Min Deposit | No minimum▼ lower | $60 |
|---|
| Spreads From | 0.5 pips▼ lower | 1.5 pips |
|---|
| Commission / lot | N/A | N/A |
|---|
| Max Leverage | 30:1▲ higher | 100:1 |
|---|
| Inactivity Fee | $12/month (after 12 months) | None |
|---|
| Deposit Fee | Free | Free |
|---|
| Deposit methods | Bank transferCredit cardDebit cardPayPal | Bank transferCredit cardDebit card |
|---|
| Withdrawal methods | Bank transferCredit card | Bank transfer |
|---|
| Withdrawal Fee | Free | Free |
|---|
| Regulators | ASIC FCA MAS | BAPPEBTI OJK |
|---|
| Platforms | TradingView MetaTrader 4 Proprietary Web/Mobile | MetaTrader 5 Proprietary Web/Mobile |
|---|
| Active bonuses |
|---|
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Negative balance protection
Investor compensation scheme coverage
No deposit fees
MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported
Mobile trading app available
Proprietary trading platform available
Advanced charting tools included
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Phone support available
Pros
BAPPEBTI-licensed and OJK-registered, full Indonesian regulatory compliance
OJK registration no. S-130/PM.02/2025 is publicly verifiable
Supports MetaTrader 5 alongside proprietary platform
Local Indonesian bank transfer funding with IDR accounts
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Raw spread account available
No deposit fees
No inactivity fee
Mobile trading app available
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Phone support available
Cons
Inactivity fee after 12 months of no trading
Not available to US residents
Proprietary platform visual design lags behind IG and Saxo
Research depth weaker than IG's Reuters/Morningstar environment
No raw spread account option
Support available in limited languages
Cons
Only available to Indonesian residents, no international clients
Higher minimum deposit than some domestic peers
Narrow product range limited to forex and commodity futures
No top-tier regulatory licence
No negative balance protection
No investor compensation scheme
Limited charting capabilities
Support available in limited languages
Dig deeper into each broker’s features, fees, and regulation.
Score 3.7 / 5
Personalised recommendation
Answer 6 quick questions and we’ll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker