AMarkets vs Swissquote Crypto Exchange Comparison
A head-to-head comparison of AMarkets and Swissquote across security, fees, coin selection, staking, and editorial scoring.
Score 3.3 / 5
AMarkets is an offshore multi-asset broker offering crypto CFDs with extremely high leverage - suited to aggressive traders comfortable with offshore regulatory risk.
VS
Score 4.1 / 5
Swissquote offers crypto CFDs and real crypto purchases through a Swiss-banking regulated environment - the only major multi-asset broker operating under FINMA supervision with a full banking licence, combining institutional-grade security with digital asset access.
Our Verdict
Swissquote winsClear Winner
Swissquote comes out ahead with an editorial score of 4.1/5 compared to AMarkets's 3.3/5.
Swissquote
4.1/5
AMarkets
3.3/5
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which exchange wins for each type of crypto trader, based on security, fees, coin selection, and editorial scoring.
Best for security
Recommended
Swissquote scores higher on security: top-tier regulation, segregated funds.
Best for low fees
It's a tie
Both equally suited
Both exchanges offer equivalent fee conditions — no deposit fee and no inactivity fee.
Best for beginners
Recommended
Swissquote edges out AMarkets with a higher editorial score (4.1/5 vs 3.3/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new crypto traders.
Best for coin selection
Insufficient data
Data not yet available
Coin-selection data is not yet available for this pair. Check each exchange's supported assets page to compare the number of tradeable cryptocurrencies.
Best for DeFi & Web3
Insufficient data
Data not yet available
DeFi and NFT feature data is not yet available for this pair. Check each exchange's Web3 product pages directly.
AMarkets vs Swissquote: Side-by-Side Crypto Exchange Comparison
| Criteria |  AMarkets |  Swissquote |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial Score | 3.3/ 5 | 4.1/ 5 |
| Min. Deposit | $100 | $1,000 |
| Regulators | SVGFSA | DFSA FINMA FCA |
| Cold Storage | No | No |
| Proof of Reserves | No | No |
| Staking | No | No |
| DeFi Integration | No | No |
| NFT Trading | No | No |
| 500+ Coins | No | No |
| P2P Trading | No | No |
| Crypto Earn / Savings | No | No |
| Token Launchpad | No | No |
| Visit exchange | Visit AMarkets | Visit Swissquote |
AMarkets vs Swissquote Crypto Exchange Pros & Cons
Pros
- Crypto CFDs available with high leverage options
- MT4/MT5 with copy trading integration
- Low spreads on standard and ECN account types
Cons
- Offshore regulation (SVG/FSA) - minimal investor protection
- 3000:1 leverage on forex is extremely high-risk
- Limited regulated transparency versus tier-1 brokers
Pros
- FINMA Swiss banking licence - strongest institutional-grade regulatory framework in retail multi-asset crypto
- Both crypto CFDs and real crypto purchase/custody available through the same account
- Swiss Depositor Protection - stronger client asset coverage than FSCS or MiFID
- Access to 60,000+ instruments alongside crypto in one Swiss-banking account
Cons
- Significantly higher costs than retail CFD competitors - spreads are premium
- Higher minimum deposit - not suited for beginner or small-capital traders
- Narrower crypto coin selection than eToro or Capital.com
- Platform sophistication creates a steep learning curve
AMarkets vs Swissquote: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each exchange meets or misses within each scoring category.
1
AMarkets
criteria win
2
Swissquote
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two exchanges differ
| Criteria | AMarkets | Swissquote |
|---|---|---|
| Security | ||
| Cold storage for assets | Fail | Fail |
| Proof of reserves published | Fail | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, etc.) | Fail | Pass |
| Fees | ||
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Fail | Fail |
| Transparent pricing page | Fail | Pass |
| Features | ||
| Staking available | Fail | Fail |
| DeFi integration | Fail | Fail |
| NFT trading | Fail | Fail |
| 500+ coins listed | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Fail |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
AMarkets vs Swissquote: Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our independent editorial scoring, Swissquote ranks higher with a score of 4.1/5 vs 3.3/5 for AMarkets. The best choice still depends on your individual needs — security, coin selection, fees, and staking offerings all matter.
Swissquote scores higher on our security criteria. When evaluating exchange safety, look for cold storage, proof of reserves, regulatory oversight, and segregated client funds. Always verify the current security posture directly with the exchange.
AMarkets and Swissquote appear similar on fee criteria in our data. Compare each exchange's trading fee schedule directly, as crypto fees vary by asset, volume tier, and payment method.
Neither AMarkets nor Swissquote is listed as offering staking in our data. Check each exchange's website directly for the most up-to-date staking offerings, as this feature changes frequently.
AMarkets has a lower minimum deposit of $100, while Swissquote requires at least $1000. This makes AMarkets more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
For beginners: AMarkets has a lower minimum deposit ($100); Swissquote has a higher overall editorial score. Also consider each exchange's educational resources, customer support quality, and the simplicity of their user interface before deciding.
More Crypto Exchange Comparisons
More AMarkets comparisons
Personalised recommendation
Not sure which broker is right for you?
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker