IC Markets vs NAGA Stock Broker Comparison
A head-to-head comparison of IC Markets and NAGA across regulation, commissions, platforms, and editorial scoring.
IC Markets offers Shares CFDs on 2,000+ global stocks via MT5 and IRESS, combining its benchmark ECN infrastructure with direct equity access - a strong complement to its core forex offering for active traders who also need equity exposure.
NAGA offers share CFDs on 600+ global stocks via its proprietary platform with integrated Autocopy social trading under CySEC regulation - a social-first regulated equity CFD platform for traders who want to copy proven stock strategies.
IC Markets edges ahead with a score of 4.1/5 vs NAGA's 3.7/5. A narrow margin, so review the breakdown below to see where each broker has a clear advantage.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of stock trader, based on costs, safety, features, and editorial scoring.
Both brokers show an equally strong safety profile across regulation, fund protection, and client safeguards.
IC Markets has the edge for active traders: more platform options, advanced charting.
IC Markets edges out NAGA with a higher editorial score (4.1/5 vs 3.7/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new stock investors.
Commission data is not yet available for this pair. Check each broker's pricing page to compare trading costs directly.
Long-term investing feature data (fractional shares, dividend reinvestment, IPO access) is not yet available for this pair.
IC Markets vs NAGA: Side-by-Side Stock Broker Comparison
| Editorial score | 4.1/ 5 | 3.7/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Min deposit | $200 | No minimum |
| Commission-free | No | No |
| Fractional shares | No | No |
| Dividend reinvestment | No | No |
| Extended hours | No | No |
| IPO access | No | No |
| Short selling | Yes | Yes |
| Regulators | FSCA ASIC CySEC | FSCA CySEC BaFin |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 cTrader TradingView | MetaTrader 5 NAGA Trader |
| Visit broker | Visit IC Markets | Visit NAGA |
IC Markets vs NAGA Stock Broker Pros & Cons
- 2,000+ share CFDs across US, UK, ASX, European, and Asian exchanges on MT5 and IRESS
- IRESS provides genuine DMA access to ASX and major global equity markets
- Commission-transparent pricing: USD 0.02/share on US stocks, no spread markup
- ASIC and CySEC regulated - tier-1 regulatory coverage for equity CFD trading
- CFDs only - no real share ownership, ISA wrapper, or dividend reinvestment programme
- 2,000+ stock range narrower than CMC Markets (10,000+) or Interactive Brokers
- IRESS monthly fee makes DMA access uneconomical for low-frequency traders
- Not available to US residents; 5:1 leverage cap applies on retail share CFDs
- Autocopy enables proportional copying of Champions' equity portfolios in real time
- CySEC and FCA regulated; Frankfurt Stock Exchange listed
- No minimum deposit; share CFDs across major US, UK, and European markets
- Social trading extends equity copy trading to a structured regulated environment
- Share CFDs only - no real ownership, ISA, dividends, or voting rights
- Inactivity fee applies after 90 days - unusually short industry window
- Stock selection (600+) narrower than IG, CMC, or Saxo
- Platform analytical depth below CMC Next Generation or xStation 5
IC Markets vs NAGA: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
| Criteria | IC Markets | NAGA |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, SEC, etc.) | Pass | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS, SIPC) | Pass | Pass |
| Costs | ||
| Commission-free trading | Fail | Fail |
| Features | ||
| Fractional shares | Fail | Fail |
| Dividend reinvestment (DRIP) | Fail | Fail |
| Extended hours trading | Fail | Fail |
| IPO access | Fail | Fail |
| Short selling | Pass | Pass |
| Stock screener tool | Fail | Pass |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Fail |
| Phone support | Pass | Fail |
IC Markets vs NAGA: Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our independent editorial scoring, IC Markets ranks higher with a score of 4.1/5 vs 3.7/5 for NAGA. The best choice still depends on your needs — commissions, features like fractional shares, and regulatory coverage all matter.
Neither IC Markets nor NAGA is listed as offering commission-free trading in our data. Compare each broker's commission schedule directly, as fees vary by account type and the markets you trade.
Both IC Markets and NAGA hold top-tier regulatory licences, indicating a high standard of investor protection. Confirm each broker's specific regulatory bodies and compensation scheme coverage to ensure they apply in your jurisdiction.
NAGA has a lower minimum deposit of no minimum required, while IC Markets requires at least $200. This makes NAGA more accessible for traders starting with limited capital.
IC Markets supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, TradingView and NAGA offers MetaTrader 5, NAGA Trader. Platform availability affects the tools, charting, and order types available to you. If you rely on a specific platform like MetaTrader or a proprietary web app, confirm compatibility before opening an account.
For beginners: NAGA has a lower minimum deposit (no minimum); IC Markets has a higher overall editorial score. Also compare educational resources, customer support quality, and the simplicity of each broker's platform before deciding.
More Stock Broker Comparisons
More IC Markets comparisons
More NAGA comparisons
Personalised recommendation
Not sure which broker is right for you?
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker