Hantec Marketsvs
Interactive BrokersForex Broker Comparison
In this matchup, Hantec Markets and Interactive Brokers square off over regulation, fees, and platforms, highlighting tension between raw ECN pricing and expansive market access.
Who should choose Hantec Markets vs Interactive Brokers?
Find out which broker best suits your trader profile.
Choose if…
Choose Hantec Markets if you want MT4/MT5 access with raw ECN pricing from 0.0 pips at $6 per round-turn. You also trade across a 300-instrument universe.
Choose if…
Choose Interactive Brokers if you want a proprietary platform (TWS). You gain access to 17,000 instruments.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Best for low cost trading
Recommended
Hantec Markets vs Interactive Brokers: Side-by-Side Forex Broker Comparison
Score
= highlighted score shows which broker leads in that category| Editorial score | 4.1/ 5 | 4.6/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 4.4 / 5 | 4.8 / 5▲ |
Hantec Markets vs Interactive Brokers Forex Broker Pros & Cons
Pros
FCA (502635) and JFSA dual regulation - rare combination at retail level
No minimum deposit on Professional ECN account
Raw ECN spreads from 0.0 pips at $6 round-turn commission
FSCS protection up to GBP 85,000 for UK clients
Strong Japanese-language service infrastructure for East Asian traders
Hantec Markets vs Interactive Brokers: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
2
Hantec Markets
criteria wins
2
Interactive Brokers
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
| Criteria | Hantec Markets | Interactive Brokers |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Pass | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Pass | Pass |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Pass | Pass |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Pass | Fail |
| Proprietary platform | Fail | Pass |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Fail | Pass |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Fail |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
| Multilingual support | Pass | Pass |
Hantec Markets vs Interactive Brokers: Frequently Asked Questions
Interactive Brokers rates 4.6/5 versus 4.1/5 for Hantec Markets. Interactive Brokers edges ahead on our composite score, though both brokers meet a reasonable standard for most traders.
Hantec Markets starts from 0 pips, tighter than Interactive Brokers's 0.2 pips. Tighter spreads lower the cost per trade, which matters most for high-frequency and scalping strategies.
Neither Hantec Markets nor Interactive Brokers requires a minimum deposit, making both accessible regardless of starting capital.
Both Hantec Markets and Interactive Brokers hold licences from top-tier regulators, indicating a high standard of regulatory oversight. Check each broker's specific regulatory bodies to confirm coverage in your jurisdiction.
For beginners, both brokers provide negative balance protection. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources on each broker's site before deciding.
Hantec Markets lists maximum leverage of 500:1, while Interactive Brokers lists up to 50:1. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
Interactive Brokers charges $2 per lot, lower than Hantec Markets's $6 per lot. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day.
Hantec Markets supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, while Interactive Brokers supports Trader Workstation (TWS), Proprietary Web/Mobile. Hantec Markets has exclusive access to MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5. Interactive Brokers has exclusive access to Trader Workstation (TWS) and Proprietary Web/Mobile.
