FBSvs
SpreadexForex Broker Comparison
In a head-to-head comparison, FBS and Spreadex balance cost and access differently. The axis of tension centers between regulation, platform support, and instrument access.
Who should choose FBS vs Spreadex?
Find out which broker best suits your trader profile.
Choose if…
Choose FBS if you want MT4/MT5 access on all accounts and a $1 minimum deposit.
Choose if…
Choose Spreadex if you want FCA regulation with investor compensation and advanced charting via TradingView.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
Best for low cost trading
Recommended
FBS vs Spreadex: Side-by-Side Forex Broker Comparison
Score
= highlighted score shows which broker leads in that category| Editorial score | 3.9/ 5 | 4.0/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 3.5 / 5 | 4.5 / 5▲ |
FBS vs Spreadex Forex Broker Pros & Cons
Pros
Very low $1 minimum deposit on Cent accounts
MT4 and MT5 on all account types
Multiple account types including Cent, Zero Spread, and ECN
Widely available across Southeast Asia, MENA, and Africa
Client funds held in segregated accounts
FBS vs Spreadex: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
4
FBS
criteria wins
4
Spreadex
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two brokers differ
| Criteria | FBS | Spreadex |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Fail | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Fail | Pass |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Pass | Fail |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Pass | Fail |
| Proprietary platform | Fail | Pass |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Fail | Pass |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Fail |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
| Multilingual support | Pass | Fail |
FBS vs Spreadex: Frequently Asked Questions
The scores are close: FBS rates 3.9/5 and Spreadex rates 4/5. Spreadex has a marginal edge in our scoring, but the difference is small enough that your specific priorities — fees, platforms, or regulatory jurisdiction — should guide the final choice.
FBS starts from 0 pips, tighter than Spreadex's 0.6 pips. Tighter spreads lower the cost per trade, which matters most for high-frequency and scalping strategies.
Spreadex has no minimum deposit, while FBS requires at least $1. This makes Spreadex more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
Spreadex holds top-tier regulation (FCA), providing stronger investor protections. FBS may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
For beginners, two factors stand out: Spreadex has no minimum deposit, removing the capital barrier entirely, and both brokers provide negative balance protection. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
FBS lists maximum leverage of 3000:1, while Spreadex lists up to 30:1. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
FBS charges $20 per lot on commission-based accounts. Commission details for Spreadex are not currently available. Check their website for up-to-date pricing.
FBS supports MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4, while Spreadex supports Proprietary Web/Mobile, TradingView. FBS has exclusive access to MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4. Spreadex has exclusive access to Proprietary Web/Mobile and TradingView.
