EightCap and OANDA face off in a cross-continental regulatory framework with differing platform ecosystems. The clash centers on pricing clarity, platform breadth, and instrument variety, building anticipation for the verdict.
Find out which broker best suits your trader profile.
Choose if…
Choose EightCap if you want raw spreads from 0 pips with $7/lot and four platforms on one account.
Choose if…
Choose OANDA if you value a $0 minimum deposit, a proprietary platform, and MT4/MT5 access.
Which broker wins for each type of trader, based on costs, safety, platforms, and editorial scoring.
| Editorial score | 4.3/ 5 | 4.6/ 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Score Breakdown | ||
Trust & Regulation 40% weight | 4.4 / 5 | 4.8 / 5▲ |
Pros
MT4, MT5, cTrader, and TradingView all available on one account
Capitalise.ai code-free automation included at no extra cost
ASIC (391441) and FCA (921296) dual regulation
Razor account: raw EUR/USD from 0.0 pips at $7 round-turn commission
No minimum deposit on Standard account
A closer look at the specific criteria each broker meets or misses within each scoring category.
| Criteria | EightCap | OANDA |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & Regulation | ||
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, CFTC, etc.) | Pass | Pass |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Negative balance protection | Pass | Pass |
| Compensation scheme (e.g. FSCS) | Pass | Pass |
| Fees & Spreads | ||
| Raw/ECN spreads available | Pass | Fail |
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Fail |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Platforms & Tools | ||
| MT4/MT5 available | Pass | Pass |
| Proprietary platform | Fail | Pass |
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| Advanced charting tools | Pass | Pass |
| Customer Support | ||
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
| Multilingual support | Pass | Pass |
The scores are close: EightCap rates 4.3/5 and OANDA rates 4.6/5. OANDA has a marginal edge in our scoring, but the difference is small enough that your specific priorities — fees, platforms, or regulatory jurisdiction — should guide the final choice.
EightCap starts from 0 pips, tighter than OANDA's 1 pips. Tighter spreads lower the cost per trade, which matters most for high-frequency and scalping strategies.
OANDA has no minimum deposit, while EightCap requires at least $100. This makes OANDA more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
Both EightCap and OANDA hold licences from top-tier regulators, indicating a high standard of regulatory oversight. Check each broker's specific regulatory bodies to confirm coverage in your jurisdiction.
For beginners, two factors stand out: OANDA has no minimum deposit, removing the capital barrier entirely, and both brokers provide negative balance protection. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
EightCap lists maximum leverage of 500:1, while OANDA lists up to 50:1. Available leverage depends on your jurisdiction. EU retail clients under ESMA rules are capped at 1:30 on major forex pairs.
EightCap charges $7 per lot on commission-based accounts. Commission details for OANDA are not currently available. Check their website for up-to-date pricing.
EightCap supports TradingView, cTrader, MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, while OANDA supports Proprietary Web/Mobile, TradingView, MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5. Both provide TradingView and MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5. EightCap has exclusive access to cTrader. OANDA has exclusive access to Proprietary Web/Mobile.
EightCap offers tighter spreads from 0.00 pips vs 1.00 pips for OANDA, reducing trading costs.
OANDA wins for safety & regulation, with broader regulators and higher trust scores.
EightCap is best for active traders seeking instrument variety and ECN-style pricing.
EightCap is better suited for scalpers: raw/ECN spreads available, tighter spreads from 0.00 pips.
Equally matched; both offer MT4/MT5 plus additional platform options.
OANDA is best for beginners due to zero minimum deposit and user-friendly platforms.
EightCap wins for instrument variety with about 800 tradables.
Fees & Spreads 30% weight | 4.6 / 5▲ | 4.5 / 5 |
|---|
Platforms & Tools 20% weight | 4.5 / 5 | 4.6 / 5▲ |
|---|
Customer Support 10% weight | 4.2 / 5 | 4.3 / 5▲ |
|---|
| Founded | 2009 | 1996 |
|---|
| Headquarters | Melbourne, Australia | New York, United States |
|---|
| Min Deposit | $100 | No minimum▼ lower |
|---|
| Spreads From | 0 pips▼ lower | 1 pips |
|---|
| Commission / lot | $7/lot | N/A |
|---|
| 0.7 pips | N/A |
| Max Leverage | 500:1 | 50:1▲ higher |
|---|
| Inactivity Fee | $10/month (after 12 months) | $10/month (after 12 months) |
|---|
| Deposit Fee | Free | Free |
|---|
| Deposit methods | Bank transferCredit cardDebit cardSkrillNetellerCrypto | Bank transferCredit cardDebit card |
|---|
| Withdrawal methods | Bank transferCredit cardSkrillNetellerCrypto | Bank transferDebit card |
|---|
| Withdrawal Fee | Free | Free for ACH |
|---|
| Regulators | ASIC FCA SCB | ASIC FCA CBI CMF NFA |
|---|
| Platforms | TradingView cTrader MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 | Proprietary Web/Mobile TradingView MetaTrader 4 MetaTrader 5 |
|---|
| Active bonuses |
|---|
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Negative balance protection
Investor compensation scheme coverage
No deposit fees
No inactivity fee
MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported
Advanced charting tools included
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Phone support available
Multilingual customer support
Pros
Available to US residents (NFA-registered)
Best-in-class research and economic data
No minimum deposit
MT4, MT5 and proprietary platforms
Regulated by top-tier authorities (FCA, ASIC, CySEC)
Client funds held in segregated accounts
Negative balance protection
Investor compensation scheme coverage
No deposit fees
MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 supported
Mobile trading app available
Advanced charting tools included
Transparent pricing with clear cost disclosure
24/5 live chat support
Phone support available
Multilingual customer support
Cons
$100 minimum on Razor ECN account
Shorter public track record than IC Markets or Pepperstone
Research and educational content thinner than larger peers
Not available to US residents
No proprietary platform
Cons
Spreads slightly wider than ECN-style brokers
No copy trading
No raw spread account option
Inactivity fee applies
OANDA's higher editorial score (4.6 vs 4.3) is accompanied by stronger trust/regulation (4.8 vs 4.4) and platforms (4.6 vs 4.5).
Dig deeper into each broker’s features, fees, and regulation.
Score 4.3 / 5
Personalised recommendation
Answer 6 quick questions and we’ll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker