FP Marketsvs
PepperstoneCrypto Exchange Comparison
FP Markets and Pepperstone face off in crypto CFD access across multiple platforms. The tension centers on regulation, coin selection, and fee structure.
Our Verdict
Too close to call
FP Markets and Pepperstone are closely matched overall, with FP Markets offering phone support.
No commercial relationship. The verdict and scores are entirely editorial. No payment influences this comparison.
Key Differences
- 1FP Markets offers phone support while Pepperstone does not.
- 2Pepperstone lists 30 coins vs FP Markets' 15.
- 3Pepperstone has FCA regulation in addition to ASIC.
Who should choose FP Markets vs Pepperstone?
Find out which crypto exchange best suits your trading profile.
Choose FP Markets if…
Choose FP Markets if you want phone support and regulated multi-asset CFDs.
Choose Pepperstone if…
Choose Pepperstone if you want a larger coin selection and broader regulator coverage.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which exchange wins for each type of crypto trader, based on security, fees, coin selection, and editorial scoring.
Best for security
It’s a tie
Both equally suited
Pepperstone wins for security with broader regulator coverage including FCA and multiple jurisdictions.
Best for low fees
It’s a tie
Both equally suited
Pepperstone is best for low fees due to tighter crypto spreads.
FP Markets vs Pepperstone: Side-by-Side Crypto Exchange Comparison
| Criteria |  FP Markets |  Pepperstone |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 4.0/ 5 | 4.0/ 5 |
| Min Deposit | $100 | No minimum▼ lower |
| Spreads From | 0 pips | 0 pips |
| Taker Fee | 6.00%▼ lower | 7.00% |
FP Markets vs Pepperstone Crypto Exchange Pros & Cons
Pros
- Crypto CFDs available on MT4, MT5, cTrader, and TradingView, no platform switching
- ASIC and CySEC regulation with segregated client funds
- Integrates into existing multi-asset account alongside forex, indices, and shares
- No commission on crypto CFDs; spread-only pricing
Cons
- CFDs only, no real crypto ownership, staking, or on-chain access
FP Markets vs Pepperstone: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each exchange meets or misses within each scoring category.
1
FP Markets
criteria win
0
Pepperstone
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two exchanges differ
| Criteria | FP Markets | Pepperstone |
|---|---|---|
| Security | ||
| Cold storage for assets | Fail | Fail |
| Proof of reserves published | Fail | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, etc.) | Pass | Pass |
| Fees | ||
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Features | ||
| Staking available | Fail | Fail |
| DeFi integration | Fail | Fail |
| NFT trading | Fail | Fail |
| 500+ coins listed | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Fail |
FP Markets vs Pepperstone: Frequently Asked Questions
FP Markets and Pepperstone share the same editorial score of 4/5. One concrete differentiator: Pepperstone requires a lower minimum deposit.
Both FP Markets and Pepperstone list the same spread figure of 0. Compare each exchange's full fee schedule, including maker/taker rates and any volume discounts, to evaluate total trading costs.
Pepperstone has no minimum deposit, while FP Markets requires at least $100. This makes Pepperstone more accessible for traders looking to start with a smaller crypto investment.
Both FP Markets and Pepperstone hold licences from top-tier regulators, indicating a high standard of regulatory oversight. Check each exchange's specific regulatory bodies to confirm coverage in your jurisdiction.
For beginners, two factors stand out: Pepperstone has no minimum deposit, removing the capital barrier entirely, and both exchanges provide negative balance protection. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
FP Markets offers up to 2:1 on perpetual or margin products, versus Pepperstone's 2:1 cap. Margin and futures trading carry higher risk than spot crypto; confirm product availability and jurisdiction-specific limits on each exchange's website.
FP Markets charges $6 per trade, lower than Pepperstone's $7 per trade. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day. Crypto fees are typically quoted as maker/taker rates rather than fixed per-trade commissions; check each exchange's fee schedule for volume-based discounts.
FP Markets supports cTrader, IRESS, MetaTrader 5, TradingView, MetaTrader 4, while Pepperstone supports cTrader, IRESS, MetaTrader 5, TradingView, MetaTrader 4. Both provide cTrader and IRESS and MetaTrader 5 and TradingView and MetaTrader 4.
