FP Markets vs IC Markets Crypto Exchange Comparison
A head-to-head comparison of FP Markets and IC Markets across security, fees, coin selection, staking, and editorial scoring.
Score 4 / 5
FP Markets offers crypto CFDs across MT4, MT5, cTrader, and TradingView with ASIC and CySEC regulation - a solid regulated CFD route to digital asset exposure for multi-asset traders who already use FP Markets for forex.
VS
Score 4.1 / 5
IC Markets offers crypto CFDs on 20+ pairs via MT4, MT5, cTrader, and TradingView with ECN-adjacent execution and ASIC/CySEC regulation - a competitive regulated route to digital asset CFD exposure for active traders.
Our Verdict
Too close to call0.1 pts apart
FP Markets and IC Markets are extremely closely matched with scores of 4/5 and 4.1/5. The right choice depends on your individual trading priorities.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which exchange wins for each type of crypto trader, based on security, fees, coin selection, and editorial scoring.
Best for security
It's a tie
Both equally suited
Both exchanges show an equally strong security profile across cold storage, proof of reserves, and regulatory oversight.
Best for low fees
It's a tie
Both equally suited
Both exchanges offer equivalent fee conditions — no deposit fee and no inactivity fee.
Best for beginners
Recommended
IC Markets edges out FP Markets with a higher editorial score (4.1/5 vs 4/5), indicating a stronger overall experience for new crypto traders.
Best for coin selection
Insufficient data
Data not yet available
Coin-selection data is not yet available for this pair. Check each exchange's supported assets page to compare the number of tradeable cryptocurrencies.
Best for DeFi & Web3
Insufficient data
Data not yet available
DeFi and NFT feature data is not yet available for this pair. Check each exchange's Web3 product pages directly.
FP Markets vs IC Markets: Side-by-Side Crypto Exchange Comparison
| Criteria |  FP Markets |  IC Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial Score | 4.0/ 5 | 4.1/ 5 |
| Min. Deposit | $100 | $200 |
| Regulators | ASIC CySEC | ASIC CySEC FSCA |
| Cold Storage | No | No |
| Proof of Reserves | No | No |
| Staking | No | No |
| DeFi Integration | No | No |
| NFT Trading | No | No |
| 500+ Coins | No | No |
| P2P Trading | No | No |
| Crypto Earn / Savings | No | No |
| Token Launchpad | No | No |
| Visit exchange | Visit FP Markets | Visit IC Markets |
FP Markets vs IC Markets Crypto Exchange Pros & Cons
Pros
- Crypto CFDs available on MT4, MT5, cTrader, and TradingView - no platform switching
- ASIC and CySEC regulation with segregated client funds
- Integrates into existing multi-asset account alongside forex, indices, and shares
- No commission on crypto CFDs; spread-only pricing
Cons
- CFDs only - no real crypto ownership, staking, or on-chain access
- Narrower coin selection than dedicated crypto exchanges
- Variable spreads on crypto can widen significantly in thin markets
- IRESS platform does not include crypto trading
Pros
- ECN-adjacent raw spreads on crypto CFDs - tighter than most retail market makers
- All four platforms (MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView) support crypto CFDs from one account
- ASIC and CySEC regulated with segregated client funds and negative balance protection
- No inactivity fee; 24/7 customer support across multiple channels
Cons
- CFDs only - no real crypto ownership, staking, or on-chain withdrawals
- Narrower coin selection (20+) than dedicated exchanges offering hundreds of tokens
- No DeFi access or NFT trading
- Not available to US residents
FP Markets vs IC Markets: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each exchange meets or misses within each scoring category.
Highlighted rows show where the two exchanges differ
| Criteria | FP Markets | IC Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Security | ||
| Cold storage for assets | Fail | Fail |
| Proof of reserves published | Fail | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, etc.) | Pass | Pass |
| Fees | ||
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Pass | Pass |
| Features | ||
| Staking available | Fail | Fail |
| DeFi integration | Fail | Fail |
| NFT trading | Fail | Fail |
| 500+ coins listed | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Pass |
FP Markets vs IC Markets: Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our independent editorial scoring, IC Markets ranks higher with a score of 4.1/5 vs 4/5 for FP Markets. The best choice still depends on your individual needs — security, coin selection, fees, and staking offerings all matter.
FP Markets and IC Markets show a similar security profile in our data. Both should be evaluated on cold storage practices, proof of reserves, regulatory oversight, and whether client funds are held separately from operational funds.
FP Markets and IC Markets appear similar on fee criteria in our data. Compare each exchange's trading fee schedule directly, as crypto fees vary by asset, volume tier, and payment method.
Neither FP Markets nor IC Markets is listed as offering staking in our data. Check each exchange's website directly for the most up-to-date staking offerings, as this feature changes frequently.
FP Markets has a lower minimum deposit of $100, while IC Markets requires at least $200. This makes FP Markets more accessible for traders with limited starting capital.
For beginners: FP Markets has a lower minimum deposit ($100); IC Markets has a higher overall editorial score. Also consider each exchange's educational resources, customer support quality, and the simplicity of their user interface before deciding.
More Crypto Exchange Comparisons
More FP Markets comparisons
More IC Markets comparisons
Personalised recommendation
Not sure which broker is right for you?
Answer 6 quick questions and we'll match you with the brokers that best fit your trading style, experience level, and country.
Find my broker