FBSvs
Fusion MarketsCrypto Exchange Comparison
Two CFD brokers compete for crypto exposure with different regulatory profiles and cost structures. This matchup tests security, asset breadth, and pricing discipline across mainstream platforms.
Our Verdict
Fusion Markets winsby 0.4 pts
Fusion Markets edges FBS on the editorial score. Fusion Markets also shows higher Trust & Regulation and Fees & Spreads scores, supported by ASIC regulation and lower trading costs.
No commercial relationship. The verdict and scores are entirely editorial. No payment influences this comparison.
Key Differences
- 1FBS provides 24/7 live chat and phone support.
- 2Fusion Markets is ASIC-regulated with negative balance protection.
- 3FBS lists more crypto coins than Fusion Markets.
Who should choose FBS vs Fusion Markets?
Find out which crypto exchange best suits your trading profile.
Choose FBS if…
Choose FBS if you value 24/7 live chat and direct phone support.
Choose Fusion Markets if…
Choose Fusion Markets if you value ASIC regulation with negative balance protection and transparent pricing.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which exchange wins for each type of crypto trader, based on security, fees, coin selection, and editorial scoring.
Best for security
Recommended
Fusion Markets is ASIC-regulated and offers negative balance protection for retail clients.
Best for low fees
It’s a tie
Both equally suited
Fusion Markets delivers lower trading costs based on its ECN pricing.
FBS vs Fusion Markets: Side-by-Side Crypto Exchange Comparison
| Criteria |  FBS |  Fusion Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 3.4/ 5 | 3.8/ 5 |
| Min Deposit | $1 | No minimum▼ lower |
| Spreads From | 0 pips | 0 pips |
| Taker Fee | 20.00% | 4.50%▼ lower |
FBS vs Fusion Markets Crypto Exchange Pros & Cons
Pros
- $1 minimum deposit, widest accessibility in the industry
- MT4/MT5 with automated crypto trading support
- 24/7 multilingual support popular in Asian markets
Cons
- Offshore regulation (IFSC Belize) for most clients, minimal investor protection
- 3000:1 leverage creates extremely high-risk trading environment
FBS vs Fusion Markets: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each exchange meets or misses within each scoring category.
2
FBS
criteria wins
3
Fusion Markets
criteria wins
Highlighted rows show where the two exchanges differ
| Criteria | FBS | Fusion Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Security | ||
| Cold storage for assets | Fail | Fail |
| Proof of reserves published | Fail | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, etc.) | Fail | Pass |
| Fees | ||
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Fail | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Fail | Pass |
| Features | ||
| Staking available | Fail | Fail |
| DeFi integration | Fail | Fail |
| NFT trading | Fail | Fail |
| 500+ coins listed | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Fail |
| Phone support | Pass | Fail |
FBS vs Fusion Markets: Frequently Asked Questions
The scores are close: FBS rates 3.4/5 and Fusion Markets rates 3.8/5. Fusion Markets has a marginal edge in our scoring, but the difference is small enough that your specific priorities — fees, platforms, or regulatory jurisdiction — should guide the final choice.
Both FBS and Fusion Markets list the same spread figure of 0. Compare each exchange's full fee schedule, including maker/taker rates and any volume discounts, to evaluate total trading costs.
Fusion Markets has no minimum deposit, while FBS requires at least $1. This makes Fusion Markets more accessible for traders looking to start with a smaller crypto investment.
Fusion Markets holds top-tier regulation (ASIC, VFSC), providing stronger investor protections. FBS may be regulated but does not hold top-tier status in our data. Verify regulatory status on each regulator's public register before depositing funds.
Fusion Markets stands out for beginners: it has a lower entry point and provides negative balance protection, which caps losses at your deposited amount. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources before deciding.
FBS offers up to 2:1 on perpetual or margin products, versus Fusion Markets's 2:1 cap. Margin and futures trading carry higher risk than spot crypto; confirm product availability and jurisdiction-specific limits on each exchange's website.
Fusion Markets charges $4.5 per trade, lower than FBS's $20 per trade. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day. Crypto fees are typically quoted as maker/taker rates rather than fixed per-trade commissions; check each exchange's fee schedule for volume-based discounts.
FBS supports MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4, while Fusion Markets supports cTrader, MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4. Both provide MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4. Fusion Markets has exclusive access to cTrader.
Fusion Markets scores better on fee criteria (no deposit fee, no inactivity fee). Always check both exchanges' current fee schedules, as maker/taker rates and withdrawal fees vary and are subject to change.
