Admiralsvs
PepperstoneCrypto Exchange Comparison
This comparison pits two regulated crypto CFD brokers against each other, both offering CFDs on crypto, but with different platform ecosystems and support features.
Our Verdict
Pepperstone winsby 0.1 pts
Admirals and Pepperstone are closely matched in crypto CFDs, but Admirals differentiates itself with phone support.
No commercial relationship. The verdict and scores are entirely editorial. No payment influences this comparison.
Key Differences
- 1Admirals provides phone support for clients.
- 2Pepperstone offers transparent pricing.
- 3Pepperstone offers MT4/MT5 plus cTrader and TradingView.
Who should choose Admirals vs Pepperstone?
Find out which crypto exchange best suits your trading profile.
Choose Admirals if…
Choose Admirals if you value direct phone support for trading help and timely guidance across a broad multi-asset offering worldwide. You access crypto CFDs on MT4 and MT5 under FCA, CySEC, and ASIC oversight worldwide.
Choose Pepperstone if…
Choose Pepperstone if you want transparent pricing, clear crypto spreads, and predictable costs for tempo trading. You gain a broader platform mix with MT4/MT5, plus cTrader, TradingView, and IRESS, enabling diverse workflow options for professional traders.
Verdict by Trader Profile
Which exchange wins for each type of crypto trader, based on security, fees, coin selection, and editorial scoring.
Best for security
It’s a tie
Both equally suited
Admirals provides FSCS protection for UK clients and broad FCA/CySEC/ASIC oversight.
Best for low fees
Recommended
Admirals vs Pepperstone: Side-by-Side Crypto Exchange Comparison
| Criteria |  Admirals |  Pepperstone |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 3.9/ 5 | 4.0/ 5 |
| Min Deposit | No minimum | No minimum |
| Spreads From | 0.5 pips | 0 pips▼ lower |
| Taker Fee | 6.00%▼ lower | 7.00% |
Admirals vs Pepperstone Crypto Exchange Pros & Cons
Pros
- 30+ crypto CFDs on MT4 and MT5 under FCA, CySEC, and ASIC regulation
- MetaTrader Supreme Edition plugin adds enhanced charting and sentiment tools
- No minimum deposit; FSCS protection up to GBP 85,000 for UK retail clients
- Broad multi-asset offering, crypto alongside forex, equities, ETFs, and commodities
Cons
- CFDs only, no real crypto ownership, staking, or on-chain access
Admirals vs Pepperstone: Detailed Category Breakdown
A closer look at the specific criteria each exchange meets or misses within each scoring category.
1
Admirals
criteria win
1
Pepperstone
criteria win
Highlighted rows show where the two exchanges differ
| Criteria | Admirals | Pepperstone |
|---|---|---|
| Security | ||
| Cold storage for assets | Fail | Fail |
| Proof of reserves published | Fail | Fail |
| Segregated client funds | Pass | Pass |
| Top-tier regulator (FCA, ASIC, etc.) | Pass | Pass |
| Fees | ||
| No deposit fee | Pass | Pass |
| No inactivity fee | Pass | Pass |
| Transparent pricing page | Fail | Pass |
| Features | ||
| Staking available | Fail | Fail |
| DeFi integration | Fail | Fail |
| NFT trading | Fail | Fail |
| 500+ coins listed | Fail | Fail |
| Support | ||
| Mobile app | Pass | Pass |
| 24/5 live chat | Pass | Pass |
| Phone support | Pass | Fail |
Admirals vs Pepperstone: Frequently Asked Questions
The scores are close: Admirals rates 3.9/5 and Pepperstone rates 4/5. Pepperstone has a marginal edge in our scoring, but the difference is small enough that your specific priorities — fees, platforms, or regulatory jurisdiction — should guide the final choice.
Pepperstone lists a lower spread from 0, compared with Admirals's 0.5. Crypto trading costs are typically quoted as a percentage of the trade value; check each exchange's full fee schedule, as maker/taker rates and volume discounts vary.
Neither Admirals nor Pepperstone requires a minimum deposit, making both accessible regardless of starting capital.
Both Admirals and Pepperstone hold licences from top-tier regulators, indicating a high standard of regulatory oversight. Check each exchange's specific regulatory bodies to confirm coverage in your jurisdiction.
For beginners, both exchanges provide negative balance protection. Also compare demo account availability and educational resources on each exchange's site before deciding.
Admirals offers up to 2:1 on perpetual or margin products, versus Pepperstone's 2:1 cap. Margin and futures trading carry higher risk than spot crypto; confirm product availability and jurisdiction-specific limits on each exchange's website.
Admirals charges $6 per trade, lower than Pepperstone's $7 per trade. Lower commissions benefit active traders who execute many trades per day. Crypto fees are typically quoted as maker/taker rates rather than fixed per-trade commissions; check each exchange's fee schedule for volume-based discounts.
Admirals supports MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4, while Pepperstone supports cTrader, IRESS, MetaTrader 5, TradingView, MetaTrader 4. Both provide MetaTrader 5 and MetaTrader 4. Pepperstone has exclusive access to cTrader and IRESS and TradingView.
